2012
DOI: 10.1108/13673271211238797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Books as a knowledge translation mechanism: citation analysis and author survey

Abstract: Purpose -As a response to the claims that much of management academic research is irrelevant from the practitioner perspective, this study aims to empirically investigate whether books serve as effective knowledge distribution agents and whether peer-reviewed publications are used in the development of book content.Design/methodology/approach -A citation analysis of 40 authored and nine edited books was done, followed by a survey of 35 book authors.Findings -This study refutes the previous claims that manageme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two common complaints about academic articles are that they are long and boring (Bennis and O'Toole, 2005;Booker, Bontis and Serenko, 2012;Serenko, Bontis and Moshonsky, 2012). For example, many KM practitioners do not read academic journals because they do not have time to go through multiple pages of a publication to obtain only a few insights (Booker, Bontis and Serenko, 2008).…”
Section: Article Attributesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two common complaints about academic articles are that they are long and boring (Bennis and O'Toole, 2005;Booker, Bontis and Serenko, 2012;Serenko, Bontis and Moshonsky, 2012). For example, many KM practitioners do not read academic journals because they do not have time to go through multiple pages of a publication to obtain only a few insights (Booker, Bontis and Serenko, 2008).…”
Section: Article Attributesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Very little is known about the societal relevance of monographs. Only recent, Serenko et al have published research on societal relevance in the field of knowledge management and intellectual capital (Serenko, Bontis, & Moshonsky, 2011). Within knowledge management, there is a relatively clear distinction between scholars and practitioners.…”
Section: Scientific Impact Societal Relevance and Monographsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very little is known about the societal relevance of monographs. Only recent, Serenko et al have published research on societal relevance in the eld of knowledge management and intellectual capital (Serenko, Bontis, & Moshonsky, 2011). Within knowledge management, there is a relatively clear distinction between scholars and practitioners.…”
Section: Scienti C Impact Societal Relevance and Monographsmentioning
confidence: 99%