2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2020.103347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boolean algebras of conditionals, probability and logic

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(100 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison with other approaches, like [13], see [25,Section 9]. In analogy to formula (2), where the indicator of a conditional event "A given H" is defined as A|H " A ^H `ppA|Hq s H, the iterated conditional "B|K given A|H" is defined as follows (see, e.g., [18,19,22]):…”
Section: Preliminary Notions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison with other approaches, like [13], see [25,Section 9]. In analogy to formula (2), where the indicator of a conditional event "A given H" is defined as A|H " A ^H `ppA|Hq s H, the iterated conditional "B|K given A|H" is defined as follows (see, e.g., [18,19,22]):…”
Section: Preliminary Notions and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it seems likely that in certain situations, a richer language of conditionals would be useful, eg. considering conditional logics in the style of Kern-Isberner's three-valued conditionals [14] or the logic of Boolean conditionals [6]. Secondly, other interpretations of the probability entailment can be explored: for instance, to allow for interpreting the weights in valued formulas not only as a lower bound but with other constraints like an equality or a strict lower bound, or to compute the probability of the conclusion of an argument by means of the Maximum Entropy distribution underlying the premises [26,22].…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After obtaining N g , q, q m , u, and u m through the above calculations, equation (22) can calculate an average probability P gq [35] of the generated programs having the pass ratio over 90%, and they are generated from the sample programs. We assume that there are j programs with a pass ratio of code more than 90%, so P(K j |P gt ) represents the probability of the pass ratio of similarity checking more than 90% for these j programs is real, as shown in equation ( 23) [36], where P(K j ∩ P gt ) means the probability of there are at most j programs having the pass ratio of code similarity 10 Scientific Programming checking over 90% in the generated programs, and K j indicates there are j programs having the pass ratio of code similarity checking over 90% within the generated programs produced by the code transform model at a time. According to the abovementioned statistics, we know that the probability of j programs having the pass ratio of code similarity checking over 90% is P(K j |P gt ).…”
Section: Predetermining the Number Of Generated Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%