2015
DOI: 10.1002/fut.21721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Booms and Busts in Commodity Markets: Bubbles or Fundamentals?

Abstract: This paper considers whether there were periodically collapsing rational speculative bubbles in commodity prices over a 40‐year period from the late 1960s. We apply a switching regression approach to a broad range of commodities using two different measures of fundamental values—estimated from convenience yields and from a set of macroeconomic factors believed to affect commodity demand. We find reliable evidence for bubbles only among crude oil and feeder cattle, showing the popular belief that the extreme pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Tsvetanov et al (2016) apply the GSADF test to crude oil prices, finding significant bubble periods. Alternative bubble detection methodologies have also been used, such as Zhou and Sornette's (2009) D-test (oil price in Zhang and Yao, 2016); van Norden and Schaller's (1993) switching regression model (grains, softs, animals and woods, precious metals, and energy in Brooks et al, 2015); or the momentum threshold autoregressive (MTAR) approach (US corn, soybean and wheat prices) of Adämmer and Bohl (2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Tsvetanov et al (2016) apply the GSADF test to crude oil prices, finding significant bubble periods. Alternative bubble detection methodologies have also been used, such as Zhou and Sornette's (2009) D-test (oil price in Zhang and Yao, 2016); van Norden and Schaller's (1993) switching regression model (grains, softs, animals and woods, precious metals, and energy in Brooks et al, 2015); or the momentum threshold autoregressive (MTAR) approach (US corn, soybean and wheat prices) of Adämmer and Bohl (2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…volatility to increase more than a positive shock of the same magnitude. Such asymmetries are typically attributed to leverage effects (Brooks, 2008). Thus, in order to capture asymmetries, we extend the original EGARCH model by Nelson (1991) 4 to include our psychological and institutional factors:…”
Section: Algierimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several studies reveal that the increased trading volumes of commodity futures contracts from speculators cannot be directly credited for the recent fluctuations in commodity futures prices (Brooks, Prokopczuk, & Wu, 2015;Fattouh, Kilian, & Mahadeva, 2012;Manera, Nicolini, & Vignati, 2013;Tse & Williams, 2013). Instead, the increased investor attention to commodity market is proposed as a possible factor.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%