2007
DOI: 10.1093/revfin/hhm012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Booms, Busts, and Fraud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
85
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sign of this coefficient indicates that when the size of the transactions (here flows of deposits) increases, the size of the related losses increases as well, in particular the extreme ones. A similar effect has been discovered for internal frauds by Povel et al [2007]. Our result is also consistent with Cope et al [2012] who found a positive effect of GDP per capita on expected size of EFRAUD losses 18 .…”
Section: Economic Interpretation Of the Dependence Structuresupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The sign of this coefficient indicates that when the size of the transactions (here flows of deposits) increases, the size of the related losses increases as well, in particular the extreme ones. A similar effect has been discovered for internal frauds by Povel et al [2007]. Our result is also consistent with Cope et al [2012] who found a positive effect of GDP per capita on expected size of EFRAUD losses 18 .…”
Section: Economic Interpretation Of the Dependence Structuresupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Underemployment of production factors can act to reduce the absolute return to that factor, regardless of the size of the economy, and can have social consequences that extend beyond the production function and can manifest themselves in high levels of fraud and other criminal activities. However, on the other hand, Povel et al (2007) show that firms have higher incentives to commit fraud during economic boom times, which may imply higher severity of fraud during periods of low unemployment. Botero et al (2004) note that high unemployment rates often correlate with high levels of labor protection.…”
Section: Macroeconomic Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Overinvesting and acquisitions can occur even when the manager does not realize the overvaluation, either because he has strong hubris (Roll, 1986), he is overconfident (Malmendier and Tate, 2005), or he is overly optimistic (Heaton, 2002). In this situation, the manager believes that the high stock 3 See Baker and Wurgler (2002), Shleifer and Vishny (2003), Polk and Sapienza (2004), RKRV (2005), and Povel et al (2007). 4 Evidence of misvaluation is voluminous although much of the evidence is from large sample studies whose results are often subject to debate because of methodological issues (e.g., see Fama, 1998;Loughran and Ritter, 2000;and Mitchell and Stafford, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%