2023
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2307320120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boosted C–C coupling with Cu–Ag alloy sub-nanoclusters for CO 2 -to-C 2 H 4 photosynthesis

Yangyang Yu,
Ye He,
Ping Yan
et al.

Abstract: The selective photocatalytic conversion of CO 2 and H 2 O to high value-added C 2 H 4 remains a great challenge, mainly attributed to the difficulties in C–C coupling of reaction intermediates and desorption of C 2 H 4 * intermediates from the catalyst surface. These two key issues can be simultaneously overcome by alloying Ag with Cu which gives enhanced activity to b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, further Cu LMM AES spectra show that the binding energies (BEs) of Cu 2+ for CuGeO 3 , and CuSnO 3 shift negatively to 571.4 eV and 569.7 eV, respectively (Figure S5). This result indicates the Si can promote the electron transfer from Cu to O than Ge and Sn, enhancing the stability of Cu 2+ , resulting a reconstruction‐resistant atomic Cu−O−Si Interface of CuSiO x [19] . The results of Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) reveal that the specific surface area of CuSiO x is an impressive 461.9 m 2 /g (Figure S14), which is much higher than that of the CuGeO 3 (Figure S15, 9.9 m 2 /g) and CuSnO 3 (Figure S16, 25.3 m 2 /g).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, further Cu LMM AES spectra show that the binding energies (BEs) of Cu 2+ for CuGeO 3 , and CuSnO 3 shift negatively to 571.4 eV and 569.7 eV, respectively (Figure S5). This result indicates the Si can promote the electron transfer from Cu to O than Ge and Sn, enhancing the stability of Cu 2+ , resulting a reconstruction‐resistant atomic Cu−O−Si Interface of CuSiO x [19] . The results of Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) reveal that the specific surface area of CuSiO x is an impressive 461.9 m 2 /g (Figure S14), which is much higher than that of the CuGeO 3 (Figure S15, 9.9 m 2 /g) and CuSnO 3 (Figure S16, 25.3 m 2 /g).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result indicates the Si can promote the electron transfer from Cu to O than Ge and Sn, enhancing the stability of Cu 2 + , resulting a reconstructionresistant atomic CuÀ OÀ Si Interface of CuSiO x . [19] The results of Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) reveal that the specific surface area of CuSiO x is an impressive 461.9 m 2 /g (Figure S14), which is much higher than that of the CuGeO 3 (Figure S15, 9.9 m 2 /g) and CuSnO 3 (Figure S16, 25.3 m 2 /g).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The circuit was then connected, and spectra were collected at different potentials (Figures 4d and S24). The adsorption of CO 2 and H 2 O on the surface of CuO-Si induces the formation of H 2 O* (1640 cm −1 ), 60,61 (HCO 3 − , 1420 cm −1 ), 61,62 with high peak intensities, indicating a strong adsorption of CO 2 . With increasing the test voltage, the spectral intensity for *COOH (1180 and 1560 cm −1 ) progressively amplifies, spotlighting *COOH as a pivotal intermediate in steering CO 2 RR to C 2 products.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%