2022
DOI: 10.3390/nano12030320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boosted Cross-Linking and Characterization of High-Performing Self-Assembling Peptides

Abstract: Tissue engineering (TE) strategies require the design and characterization of novel biomaterials capable of mimicking the physiological microenvironments of the tissues to be regenerated. As such, implantable materials should be biomimetic, nanostructured and with mechanical properties approximating those of the target organ/tissue. Self-assembling peptides (SAPs) are biomimetic nanomaterials that can be readily synthesized and customized to match the requirements of some TE applications, but the weak interact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…79 It is well known that substrate stiffness can influence the fate decisions of various stem cells. 80,81 In our previous works, we demonstrated the negligible cytotoxicity of GP 17 and Sulfo-SMCC 26,27 cross-linkings of SAPs, as well as their limited effect on hNSC proliferation and differentiation. hNSCs are a well-standardized biological source for the in vitro screening of biomaterials in nervous tissue engineering and are also very sensitive to toxic compounds.…”
Section: In Vitro Testsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…79 It is well known that substrate stiffness can influence the fate decisions of various stem cells. 80,81 In our previous works, we demonstrated the negligible cytotoxicity of GP 17 and Sulfo-SMCC 26,27 cross-linkings of SAPs, as well as their limited effect on hNSC proliferation and differentiation. hNSCs are a well-standardized biological source for the in vitro screening of biomaterials in nervous tissue engineering and are also very sensitive to toxic compounds.…”
Section: In Vitro Testsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For this purpose, the tested SAPs are reported in Table 1 with their respective net charge. LDLK12 is a non-functionalized SAP widely used in regenerative medicine applications; 58 the functional motif of FAQ-LDLK12 was panned from a phage display against murine neural stem cells; 58 BM3 is a BMHP1-derived SAP, 60 linked with biotin at the N-terminal group; HYDROSAP was developed to obtain a 3D in vitro model of densely cultured hNSCs; 17 CK 1 belongs to co-assembling SAPs used for hetero-bifunctional cross-linking, 26,27 and a representative example of cationic peptides. As previously reported, 17 the purified linear sequences Ac-(Leu-Asp-Leu-Lys) 3 -CONH 2 , Ac-Lys-Leu-Pro-Gly-Trp-Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly-(Leu-Asp-Leu-Lys) 3 -CONH 2 , and Ac-Ser-Ser-Leu-Ser-Val-Asn-Asp-Gly-Gly-Gly(Leu-Asp-Leu-Lys) 3 -CONH 2 and branched tris(Leu-Asp-Leu-Lys) 3 -CONH 2 were combined and dissolved in distilled H 2 O to obtain the so-called pure HYDROSAP.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Purified peptides powder was subsequently dissolved in 0.1 M HCl to remove the presence of possible TFA salts. Three different SAPs were used for this study: pureHYDROSAP (Marchini et al, 2019;Marchini et al, 2020), FAQ (NH 2 -FAQRVPP-GGG-LDLKLDLKLDLK-CONH 2 ) (Gelain et al, 2012) and CK 1 (Ac-CGGLKLKLKLKLKLKGGC-CONH 2 ) (Pugliese et al, 2018c;Ciulla et al, 2022). As previously described, pureHYDROSAP is composed by linear SAPs Ac-(LDLK) 3 -CONH 2 , Ac-KLPGWSGGGG-(LDLK) 3 -CONH 2 (Caprini et al, 2013) and Ac-SSLSVNDGGG-(LDLK) 3 -CONH 2 (Gelain et al, 2012) and branched SAP tris(LDLK) 3 -CONH 2 (Pugliese et al, 2018a).…”
Section: Peptide Synthesis and Purificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAPs used in this work were widely applied in the field of neural stem cells (Gelain et al, 2012;Pugliese et al, 2018c;Marchini et al, 2019;Marchini et al, 2020). It is well-known that brain tissue is very soft, with a stiffness ranging from 0.1kPa to 1 kPa (Ciulla et al, 2022): pancreas stiffness lays in the similar range (Guimarães et al, 2020), with healthy pancreas tissue ~900 Pa and with increased ECM stiffness in pancreatic cancer (~2,900 Pa) (LeSavage et al, 2022). Three different SAPs (HYDROSAP, FAQ and CK 1 ) were evaluated in terms of rheological analysis to investigate their viscoelastic and mechanical properties, as well as to compare their characteristics to that of pancreatic tissue.…”
Section: Fabrication Of Bioscaffolds For In Vitro 3d Hpis Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%