2022
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021014989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Booster BNT162b2 optimizes SARS-CoV-2 humoral response in patients with myeloma: the negative effect of anti-BCMA therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
41
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, after the third dose no patients and controls were seronegative. These findings are consistent with previously published research on the antibody kinetics in cancer patients after a period of a few months following full vaccination [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Furthermore, a recently published meta-analysis demonstrated reduced seroconversion rates after one COVID-19 vaccine dose in patients with solid cancers (Risk Ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.46–0.65; I2 = 78%; Absolute Risk: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.36–0.53; I2 = 84%) in comparison with immunocompetent controls; yet, the administration of a second dose led to significantly increased seroconversion (Risk Ratio: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.88–0.93; I2 = 51%; Absolute Risk: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.86–0.91; I2 = 49%), whereas the 3rd dose was associated with enhanced humoral response in vaccine non-responders with solid tumors, further highlighting the benefits of a booster dose [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Indeed, after the third dose no patients and controls were seronegative. These findings are consistent with previously published research on the antibody kinetics in cancer patients after a period of a few months following full vaccination [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Furthermore, a recently published meta-analysis demonstrated reduced seroconversion rates after one COVID-19 vaccine dose in patients with solid cancers (Risk Ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.46–0.65; I2 = 78%; Absolute Risk: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.36–0.53; I2 = 84%) in comparison with immunocompetent controls; yet, the administration of a second dose led to significantly increased seroconversion (Risk Ratio: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.88–0.93; I2 = 51%; Absolute Risk: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.86–0.91; I2 = 49%), whereas the 3rd dose was associated with enhanced humoral response in vaccine non-responders with solid tumors, further highlighting the benefits of a booster dose [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The decline of vaccine-induced immunity during time and the emergence of new variants led to the administration of a booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Our data demonstrate that booster immunization improved spike-specific humoral responses in MMD patients, as similar reported in a recent study 37 . Interestingly, a significant increase of the NAb titers against all the analyzed variants was achieved after the booster dose compared to full vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…who reported 23.8% (41/172) response to a third dose of vaccine. Our results on MM patients on anti‐CD38 therapy show promise, although Terpos et al 13 . reported even more encouraging data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Data on third-dose efficacy are scarce, but we saw worse results for CLL patients than Herishanu et al 12 , who reported 23.8% (41/172) response to a third dose of vaccine. Our results on MM patients on anti-CD38 therapy show promise, although Terpos et al 13 reported even more encouraging data.…”
Section: R E Su Lts a N D Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%