2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48219-9_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boosting, Bagging, and Consensus Based Classification of Multisource Remote Sensing Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it is easy to see that some of these applications could also benefit from the use of multiple classifiers (e.g., multi-source remote-sensing classification and face recognition [7,30]). Finally, in many applications, a lot of unlabelled data are acquired online during the course of operation of a pattern recognition system.…”
Section: Applications Of Semi-supervised Mcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is easy to see that some of these applications could also benefit from the use of multiple classifiers (e.g., multi-source remote-sensing classification and face recognition [7,30]). Finally, in many applications, a lot of unlabelled data are acquired online during the course of operation of a pattern recognition system.…”
Section: Applications Of Semi-supervised Mcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mammalian olfactory system uses a variety of chemical sensors, known as olfactory receptors, combined with automated pattern recognition incorporated in the olfactory bulb and olfactory cortex in the brain [8,9] . No one-receptor type alone identifies a specific odor.…”
Section: The Biological Nosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Bayesian approach has also been used in Consensus based classification of multisource remote sensing data [10,9,19], outperforming conventional multivariate methods for classification. To overcome the problem of the independence assumption (that is unrealistic in most cases), the Behavior-Knowledge Space (BKS) method [56] considers each possible combination of class labels, filling a look-up table using the available data set, but this technique requires a huge volume of training data.…”
Section: Non-generative Ensemblesmentioning
confidence: 99%