2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boosting debiasing: Impact of repeated training on reasoning

Nina Franiatte,
Esther Boissin,
Alexandra Delmas
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
7
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
7
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By and large, similar initial and final response tendencies were observed for each individual task. If anything, as previously found in Franiatte et al ( 2024 ), the training effect tended to be somewhat less pronounced for the base-rate task. However, in this task, participants’ pre-intervention performance was also already higher than for the others.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…By and large, similar initial and final response tendencies were observed for each individual task. If anything, as previously found in Franiatte et al ( 2024 ), the training effect tended to be somewhat less pronounced for the base-rate task. However, in this task, participants’ pre-intervention performance was also already higher than for the others.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Additionally, we conducted an exploratory analysis to compare our study’s reasoning performance with the similar debiasing study—adopting the same tasks and design—conducted by Franiatte et al ( 2024 ) on native English speakers. Overall, we observed a similar training effect in the two samples (see Figure S3 in Supplementary Material Section H).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations