“…The concern about spiro-OMeTAD has been extended also to environmental issues, where the impact in several categories, such as Human Toxicity and Freshwater Ecotoxicity (ILCD methodology), is very large [17,157]. Strategies oriented to the replacement of spiro-OMeTAD or to HTL-free architectures for the perovskite solar cell have been developed; an example of this exploration is the substitution of spiro-OMeTAD by a carbon layer, with only a small reduction in PCE (from 13.24% to 10.29%), which enables a potentially strong reduction in economic cost, and furthermore, addition of NiO nanoparticles (1:20, NiO:C in weight) to the carbon electrode boosts efficiency to 13.26%, thus demonstrating the viability of the HTL free solar cell with stability of 800 h in storage [54]. Jeon et al achieved longer stability (up to 320 h under 1 Sun illumination) by replacing spiro-OMeTAD with N2,N2′, N7,N7′ -tetrakis(9,9-dimethyl-9H-fluoren-2-yl)-N2,N2′,N7,N7′-tetrakis(4-methoxyphenyl)-9,9′-spirobi[fluorene]-2,2′,7,7′-tetraamine (that can be summarized as DM); the problem with this approach is that DM also has a complex processing route making it difficult to achieve cost reductions and its environmental impact has not been estimated so far [100].…”