2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boosting graphene reactivity with co-doping of boron and nitrogen atoms: CO oxidation by O2 molecule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, an earlier experimental study by Yoo and coworkers has proposed that small Pt nanoparticles supported on graphene can act as a high active electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation reaction . Although the interaction between perfect graphene and deposited metal atoms is weak due to its π‐conjugated structure, however, a number of theoretical studies have shown that chemical doping of graphene with foreign atoms can remarkably improve the dispersion of metal atoms and hence enhance their catalytic activity . For instance, it has been theoretically reported that chemically‐doped graphene with a single metal (Fe, Cu, Ni, and Ti) or nonmetal (Si, Al, and P) atom exhibits an exceptional catalytic activity for low‐temperature oxidation of CO molecule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an earlier experimental study by Yoo and coworkers has proposed that small Pt nanoparticles supported on graphene can act as a high active electrocatalyst for methanol oxidation reaction . Although the interaction between perfect graphene and deposited metal atoms is weak due to its π‐conjugated structure, however, a number of theoretical studies have shown that chemical doping of graphene with foreign atoms can remarkably improve the dispersion of metal atoms and hence enhance their catalytic activity . For instance, it has been theoretically reported that chemically‐doped graphene with a single metal (Fe, Cu, Ni, and Ti) or nonmetal (Si, Al, and P) atom exhibits an exceptional catalytic activity for low‐temperature oxidation of CO molecule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first oxygen transfers from O 2 to CO, generating CO 2 ; this occurs exothermically by −61.0/−63.8 kcal/mol with an activation energy barrier (TS1) of 15.5/12.1 kcal/mol for V B −S…O 2 …CO/ V N −S…O 2 …CO (Figure ). This barrier is lower compared to those of metal‐doped catalysts (such as M−BN (M=Co, Si), M‐PMA (M=Pt, Fe, Ir, Rh, and Ru)), and that of boron‐ and nitrogen‐doped graphene (19.4 kcal/mol) . Although the barrier of this step for Ru‐embedded h‐BN (9.7 kcal/mol) and Pt 1 /FeO x (11.3 kcal/mol) is lower, the barrier of the second oxygen transfer (16.4 and 18.2 kcal/mol) is higher compared to that of sulfur‐doped h‐BN (1.8 kcal/mol).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, the coupling mode between the generated CO 2 and the sulfur dopant should be physisorption. Energetically, the second oxygen transfer is an exothermic process with an enthalpy change of −64.0/−29.9 kcal/mol and a barrier (TS2) of 3.6/1.8 kcal/mol, which is lower than that of the first oxygen transfer and that (9.2 kcal/mol) of boron‐ and nitrogen‐doped graphene …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This barrier is lower as compared to metal‐doped catalysts (such as M‐BN (M =Co)) . M‐PMA (M=Pt, Fe, Ir, Rh, Ru,Cu(111) and Ni(111))), and lower than that of boron and nitrogen doped grapheme (0.84 eV) . Although the barrier of this step for Ru‐embedded h‐BN (0.41 eV) and Pt 1 /FeO x (0.48 eV) is lower, the barriers of the second oxygen transfer (0.71 and 0.77 eV) in these two systems are higher as compared to that of three silicon‐doped h‐BN (0.72/0.43 eV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%