2016
DOI: 10.7183/2326-3768.4.3.314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boots on the Ground at Yaxnohcah

Abstract: This study proposes a sampling method for ground-truthing LiDAR-derived data that will allow researchers to verify or predict the accuracy of results over a large area. Our case study is focused on a 24 km2area centered on the site of Yaxnohcah in the Yucatan Peninsula. This area is characterized by a variety of dense tropical rainforest and wetland vegetation zones with limited road and trail access. Twenty-one 100 x 100 m blocks were selected for study, which included examples of several different vegetation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For nearly a century, remote sensing has been used for archaeological prospection to locate otherwise hidden features and better understand past human-landscape interactions. While advances in higher quality and more easily accessible remote-sensing data have drastically increased our ability to conduct archaeological prospection [1][2][3][4][5], they also highlight how landscapes, vegetation, and visualization tools directly impact our ability to detect small archaeological features [6][7][8][9][10]. Particularly in the past two decades, novel technologies such as Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) revolutionized the use of remote sensing for archaeological prospection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For nearly a century, remote sensing has been used for archaeological prospection to locate otherwise hidden features and better understand past human-landscape interactions. While advances in higher quality and more easily accessible remote-sensing data have drastically increased our ability to conduct archaeological prospection [1][2][3][4][5], they also highlight how landscapes, vegetation, and visualization tools directly impact our ability to detect small archaeological features [6][7][8][9][10]. Particularly in the past two decades, novel technologies such as Light Detection and Ranging (lidar) revolutionized the use of remote sensing for archaeological prospection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In areas in which our survey coverage was 100%, we found cave openings not detected in the lidar. This is the most common error reported by archaeologists when using lidar imagery to detect small low-lying structures (<2 m in height) in areas of dense low vegetation [29,[64][65][66][67]. In other areas of Belize, notably the Belize River Valley, invasive Guinea grass and secondary-growth vegetation has limited the effectiveness of lidar in the identification of minor archaeological features [68].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ALS enables remote measurements of the underlying elevation of the Earth's surface and human-made structures on the landscape. This capability produces detailed topographic data for mapping and site reconnaissance purposes or investigating land use and landscape modification in antiquity (Canuto et al 2018;Chase et al 2011Chase et al , 2014Hare et al 2014;Inomata et al 2017Inomata et al , 2020Opitz 2016;Opitz and Cowley 2012;Reese-Taylor et al 2016;von Schwerin et al 2016).…”
Section: Background On the Application Of 3d Documentation Methods Inmentioning
confidence: 99%