2008
DOI: 10.1162/rest.90.3.414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors

Abstract: Researchers have increasingly realized the need to account for within-group dependence in estimating standard errors of regression parameter estimates. The usual solution is to calculate cluster-robust standard errors that permit heteroskedasticity and within-cluster error correlation, but presume that the number of clusters is large. Standard asymptotic tests can over-reject, however, with few (five to thirty) clusters. We investigate inference using cluster bootstrap-t procedures that provide asymptotic refi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
829
1
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,172 publications
(957 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
12
829
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Their estimated statistically significant 33 The number of replications in both nonparametric bootstrapping and wild bootstrapping is 1000. For a detailed explanation of nonparametric and wild bootstrapping procedures, refer to Cameron et al (2007). direct impact similar to my study implies that higher fragmentation translates to lower market value for software and manufacturing firms.…”
Section: Patent Equationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Their estimated statistically significant 33 The number of replications in both nonparametric bootstrapping and wild bootstrapping is 1000. For a detailed explanation of nonparametric and wild bootstrapping procedures, refer to Cameron et al (2007). direct impact similar to my study implies that higher fragmentation translates to lower market value for software and manufacturing firms.…”
Section: Patent Equationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The p value in Figure 3 is .003; it is estimated with the wild cluster bootstrap-t, suitable for the small number of study clusters within most categories (Cameron, Gelbach, & Miller, 2008;Ringquist, 2013). The experiments in Figure 3 are notable for their geographic reach, with encouraging results in China Mo et al, 2013), Ecuador (Carillo, Onofa, & Ponce, 2010), and India (Banerjee et al, 2007;He et al, 2008;Linden, 2008).…”
Section: Instructional Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wild bootstrap can also be used with clustered data. In this case, the entire vector of residuals for each cluster is multiplied by v * t for each bootstrap sample so as to preserve any within-cluster relationships among the error terms (see Cameron et al 2008). …”
Section: The Wild Bootstrapmentioning
confidence: 99%