2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2022.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bootstrap inference for Hawkes and general point processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for some point processes that consider additional factors affecting event occurrence rates, we introduce the conditional intensity λ(t|H), where H denotes additional conditional information. As a self-exciting point process, the conditional intensity function of the Hawkes process is defined as [34][35][36]…”
Section: Intensity Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for some point processes that consider additional factors affecting event occurrence rates, we introduce the conditional intensity λ(t|H), where H denotes additional conditional information. As a self-exciting point process, the conditional intensity function of the Hawkes process is defined as [34][35][36]…”
Section: Intensity Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bootstrap inference procedures for Hawkes processes can consist of asymptotic confidence intervals, or in cases where arrival times occur on the interval [0, T ] where T is not sufficiently large, polyhedral confidence sets may be used [10]. There also include resampling techniques such as Fixedor Recursive-Intensity Bootstrap procedures [11].…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a crucial fact, given that a wide range of tail indices is witnessed in empirical applications on duration data. Thus, for example, Hill estimation of κ yields κ = 2.1 > 2 for the IBM transaction data analyzed in Engle and Russell (1998) and κ = 2.5 > 2 on the durations between tweets in Cavaliere, Lu, Rahbek and Staerk-Østergaard (2022). Moreover, κ = 1.4 ∈ (1, 2) for the DJIA data from Embrechts, Liniger and Lin (2011), while κ = 0.7 < 1 on SPY transaction data over a single trading day (2019:07:31).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%