2010
DOI: 10.1002/for.1205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bootstrap prediction bands for forecast paths from vector autoregressive models

Abstract: The problem of forecasting from vector autoregressive models has attracted considerable attention in the literature. The most popular non-Bayesian approaches use either asymptotic approximations or bootstrapping to evaluate the uncertainty associated with the forecast. The practice in the empirical literature has been to assess the uncertainty of multi-step forecasts by connecting the intervals constructed for individual forecast periods. This paper proposes a bootstrap method of constructing prediction bands … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been recognized that a rigorous econometric analysis often requires, besides the path forecast, a joint prediction region that contains the whole future path with a prespecified coverage probability. This paper investigates the finite-sample performance of the methods of constructing joint prediction regions of Jordà and Marcellino (2010), Staszewska-Bystrova (2011) and Wolf and Wunderli (2015) in various scenarios through a MC study. The finite-sample performance of the asymptotic method of Jordà and Marcellino (2010) is clearly inferior to the bootstrap-based methods of Staszewska-Bystrova (2011) and Wolf and Wunderli (2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It has been recognized that a rigorous econometric analysis often requires, besides the path forecast, a joint prediction region that contains the whole future path with a prespecified coverage probability. This paper investigates the finite-sample performance of the methods of constructing joint prediction regions of Jordà and Marcellino (2010), Staszewska-Bystrova (2011) and Wolf and Wunderli (2015) in various scenarios through a MC study. The finite-sample performance of the asymptotic method of Jordà and Marcellino (2010) is clearly inferior to the bootstrap-based methods of Staszewska-Bystrova (2011) and Wolf and Wunderli (2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Euclidian norm seems to works better according to the simulation study in Staszewska-Bystrova (2011).…”
Section: Jpr Of Staszewska-bystrova (2011)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations