2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05885-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bootstrap quantification of estimation uncertainties in network degree distributions

Abstract: We propose a new method of nonparametric bootstrap to quantify estimation uncertainties in functions of network degree distribution in large ultra sparse networks. Both network degree distribution and network order are assumed to be unknown. The key idea is based on adaptation of the “blocking” argument, developed for bootstrapping of time series and re-tiling of spatial data, to random networks. We first sample a set of multiple ego networks of varying orders that form a patch, or a network block analogue, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This issue is related to another important research topic of generating representative samples (e.g., bootstrap samples) from a network. For bootstrap the variability is critical, but at the same time there is a need to reproduce distributions of certain network characteristics such as centrality Gel et al (2017). At the same time, bootstrap techniques that preserve centrality might not be the best ones to represent clustering.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is related to another important research topic of generating representative samples (e.g., bootstrap samples) from a network. For bootstrap the variability is critical, but at the same time there is a need to reproduce distributions of certain network characteristics such as centrality Gel et al (2017). At the same time, bootstrap techniques that preserve centrality might not be the best ones to represent clustering.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the first results on sampling on networks go back to 1960s (see, e.g., Goodman, 1961;Frank, 1968;Granovetter, 1976) and while nowadays there exist numerous graph sampling procedures (see overviews by Scott and Carrington, 2011;Ahmed et al, 2014;Kolaczyk, 2009;Simpson et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015, and references therein), still surprisingly little is known on how to reliably and efficiently quantify sampling uncertainties, without imposing typically unverifiable model specification constraints. In this section, we discuss the new method of patchwork sampling and bootstrap (based on algorithms of Thompson et al, 2016 andGel et al, 2017) that enables us to quantify sampling estimation uncertainties for network degree distribution and its functions, while using only a small proportion of network information.…”
Section: Bootstrap Algorithms On Network Patchwork Bootstrapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed steps of the patch formation are given in Figure 3, which is a modified version of respective algorithms by Thompson et al (2016) and Gel et al (2017). The advantage of the algorithm in Figure 3 is that we explore patches with a smaller number of seeds by taking a subset from the seeds we have sampled, rather than by sampling new seeds from a network.…”
Section: Labeled Snowball Sampling With Multiple Inclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations