2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Borderline ovarian tumors: Key points and workshop summary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
1
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
89
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional problem of the criteria with the interpretation of peritoneal implants is the fact that distinguishing between invasive and noninvasive implants depends predominantly on the evaluation of the junction between the implant and surrounding normal tissue, which is often not available in small biopsy specimens. 18 We reveal that the use of three markers to identify mesothelial cells, stromal fibrocytes, and myofibroblasts is valuable for evaluation of invasiveness of each peritoneal nest and can be available in small biopsy specimens. Analysis of the published series reveals that, regardless of probable differences in diagnostic criteria used, the recurrence rate is higher and the long-term survival rate lower in cases with invasive implants, regardless of whether the ovarian tumor does or does not exhibit micropapillary features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An additional problem of the criteria with the interpretation of peritoneal implants is the fact that distinguishing between invasive and noninvasive implants depends predominantly on the evaluation of the junction between the implant and surrounding normal tissue, which is often not available in small biopsy specimens. 18 We reveal that the use of three markers to identify mesothelial cells, stromal fibrocytes, and myofibroblasts is valuable for evaluation of invasiveness of each peritoneal nest and can be available in small biopsy specimens. Analysis of the published series reveals that, regardless of probable differences in diagnostic criteria used, the recurrence rate is higher and the long-term survival rate lower in cases with invasive implants, regardless of whether the ovarian tumor does or does not exhibit micropapillary features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…SBTs were classified as 'typical SBT' or 'SBT with micropapillary and/or cribriform pattern' according to previously published criteria. [14][15][16][17][18][19] Briefly, tumors characterized by variably sized fibrous papillae with a hierarchical branching architecture and lined by mildly to moderately atypical columnar, polygonal, or hobnail cells with tufting and detachment of epithelial clusters were classified as 'typical SBT.' Tumors displaying proliferation of elongate filiform micropapillae with little or no fibrovascular cores or those displaying a fused or cribriform pattern were classified as 'SBT with micropapillary/cribriform pattern.'…”
Section: Case Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that more extensive sampling was required in borderline tumours to exclude foci of invasion. According to the recommendations of the 2004 Bethesda Workshop for borderline ovarian tumours, 89 all borderline tumours should be well sampled-at least 1 block per centimetre of maximum tumour diameter for neoplasms o 10 cm and 2 sections per centimetre for larger tumours (excluding smooth-walled cystic foci). The recommendation that there should be more extensive sampling of larger tumours, especially those of mucinous type, reflects their greater likelihood of harbouring foci of invasive carcinoma.…”
Section: Tumour Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the patients in this study in clinically stage Ia had either a borderline tumor or a well differentiated tumor, which may explain why there is no woman so far with any known recurrence despite not all patients in this study had a thorough staging operation. There are controversies related to the diagnosis of borderline tumors and the management of these tumors [13][14][15][16]. The definitions for borderline ovarian tumor have changed over the years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rule of four or more epithelial cell layers as a sign of malignancy is questioned and in borderline tumors it is acceptable with a stromal micro invasion in up to 5 mm of greatest linear measurement in any single focus and non-invasive peritoneal implants [13,17]. One pathologist (AM) reevaluated the histological specimens in 2005 by using these newer definitions for borderline ovarian tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%