2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.06.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Borel extractions of converging sequences in compact sets of Borel functions

Abstract: It is well known by a classical result of Bourgain-Fremlin-Talagrand that if K is a pointwise compact set of Borel functions on a Polish space then given any cluster point f of a sequence (f n ) n∈ω in K one can extract a subsequence (f n k ) k∈ω converging to f . In the present work we prove that this extraction can be achieved in a "Borel way." This will prove in particular that the notion of analytic subspace of a separable Rosenthal compacta is absolute and does not depend on the particular choice of a den… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have already observed that B X * * consists only of Baire-1 functions and that the sequence (d n ) is dense in B X * * . As it was explained in [9, Remark 1(2)], by Debs' Theorem [7] (see also [8]) there exists a hereditary, Borel and cofinal subfamily F 0 of D. With the same reasoning, we see that there exists a hereditary, Borel and cofinal subfamily F 1 of R. We set F = F 0 ∩ F 1 . Clearly the family F is as desired.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have already observed that B X * * consists only of Baire-1 functions and that the sequence (d n ) is dense in B X * * . As it was explained in [9, Remark 1(2)], by Debs' Theorem [7] (see also [8]) there exists a hereditary, Borel and cofinal subfamily F 0 of D. With the same reasoning, we see that there exists a hereditary, Borel and cofinal subfamily F 1 of R. We set F = F 0 ∩ F 1 . Clearly the family F is as desired.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…By Fact 15, we see that the family D ∩ R is hereditary, co-analytic and cofinal in [N] ∞ . We will need the following stronger property which is essentially a consequence of the deep effective version of the Bourgain-Fremlin-Talagrand Theorem due to G. Debs [7,8]. Proof.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular interesting example is for K a separable Rosenthal compacta. By Debs' theorem [7,8] (see also [9]), in every Rosenthal compacta, C(x n ) n is uniformly tall. When K is not first countable C(x n ) n is a complete co-analytic subset of N [∞] .…”
Section: Uniform Selection Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of Krawczyk about Rosenthal compacta [13] says that this is not the case when the compactum is not first countable. Nevertheless, Debs [6,7] has shown that there is a Borel set that codes the convergence relation in a Rosenthal compactum. In the last section we shall see how the ideals in B can be used to construct a family of size ℵ 1 of pairwise non homeomorphic countable sequential spaces such that both the topology and the convergence relation are Borel and yet all of them have sequential order ω 1 .…”
Section: (Ii) I↾ a Is Borelmentioning
confidence: 99%