Re-Framing Identities 2016
DOI: 10.1515/9783035608151-013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boris Magaš and the Emergence of Postmodernist Themes in the Croatian Modernist Tradition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such strategic self-peripheralisation subscribed to an intellectual tradition in Central Europe that distinguished between ‘periphery’ and ‘province’. According to this tradition, provincial cultural production was characterised by an influence of one powerful centre; in contrast, a Central European, peripheral thinker receives impulses from many centres, and mixes and develops them (Białostocki, 1989; Moravánszky, 2012; Šerman, 2016). Along these lines, Polónyi acknowledged the delays, distortions and echoes that characterised peripheral production of knowledge, but he also saw them as an opportunity for scepticism, relativism and a pragmatic appropriation of ideas for the specific purposes at hand (Moravánszky, 2012: 335; Polónyi, 2000).…”
Section: Appropriative Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such strategic self-peripheralisation subscribed to an intellectual tradition in Central Europe that distinguished between ‘periphery’ and ‘province’. According to this tradition, provincial cultural production was characterised by an influence of one powerful centre; in contrast, a Central European, peripheral thinker receives impulses from many centres, and mixes and develops them (Białostocki, 1989; Moravánszky, 2012; Šerman, 2016). Along these lines, Polónyi acknowledged the delays, distortions and echoes that characterised peripheral production of knowledge, but he also saw them as an opportunity for scepticism, relativism and a pragmatic appropriation of ideas for the specific purposes at hand (Moravánszky, 2012: 335; Polónyi, 2000).…”
Section: Appropriative Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%