2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Born–Infeld inspired modifications of gravity

Abstract: General Relativity has shown an outstanding observational success in the scales where it has been directly tested. However, modifications have been intensively explored in the regimes where it seems either incomplete or signals its own limit of validity. In particular, the breakdown of unitarity near the Planck scale strongly suggests that General Relativity needs to be modified at high energies and quantum gravity effects are expected to be important. This is related to the existence of spacetime singularitie… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
353
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 300 publications
(361 citation statements)
references
References 388 publications
(885 reference statements)
8
353
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This theory and its extensions have been extensively studied in the literature due to their many applications in cosmology, black hole physics and astrophysics [9] (see [10] for a recent review on this class of theories). A prominent feature of this theory is that it indeed succeeds in avoiding cosmological and black hole singularities in traditional scenarios such as FLRW cosmologies [8,11] and spherically symmetric configurations with electromagnetic [12] and scalar fields [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theory and its extensions have been extensively studied in the literature due to their many applications in cosmology, black hole physics and astrophysics [9] (see [10] for a recent review on this class of theories). A prominent feature of this theory is that it indeed succeeds in avoiding cosmological and black hole singularities in traditional scenarios such as FLRW cosmologies [8,11] and spherically symmetric configurations with electromagnetic [12] and scalar fields [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On th one hand these are motivated by their capability to explain the dynamics of self-gravitating systems and the accelerated expansion of the Universe without resorting to dark matter and/or dark energy [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. On the other hand, they are also motivated by the fact that GR is not the quantum theory of gravity needed to describe the spacetime near the singularities, which, as is well known, seemingly cannot be avoided [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most interesting features is that EiBI is equivalent to GR in the vacuum while it introduces modifications in dense matter environments, where GR is experimentally not well probed. EiBI is able to describe, with only a single extra parameter (κ), astrophysical objects such as the Sun [19] and the internal structure of compact objects [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], and the cosmological expansion of the Universe [22,[27][28][29][30][31] (for comprehensive reviews see [7,12] and the references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be stressed that for the original EiBI gravity as well as the mimetic Born-Infeld gravity, in which only the symmetric part of the Ricci tensor is considered in the action, there is a projective gauge symmetry and the torsion field in the affine connection can be removed by a gauge fixing procedure. A symmetric affine connection can be chosen after the corresponding gauge fixing and an initial torsionless assumption is in general not necessary [34]. Furthermore, the theory is expected to be free of ghosts since the theory is formulated within the Palatini approach in which the equations of motion contain derivatives (naturally) up to only second order.…”
Section: The Mimetic Born-infeld Gravitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See references [34,35] for a review of Born-Infeld theories of gravity and the mimetic gravity, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%