Handbook of Low Carbon Concrete 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-804524-4.00015-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boroaluminosilicate Geopolymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are presented and discussed in Section 3 . Testing geopolymer mixtures using the conventional cementitious mixture standards is common practice [ 33 ], while Rilem Technical Committee 224-AAM is working on providing performance-based specifications and recommendations for the development of standards that will specifically apply to alkali-activated materials [ 34 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are presented and discussed in Section 3 . Testing geopolymer mixtures using the conventional cementitious mixture standards is common practice [ 33 ], while Rilem Technical Committee 224-AAM is working on providing performance-based specifications and recommendations for the development of standards that will specifically apply to alkali-activated materials [ 34 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By combining these starting materials with strong alkali solutions, they are activated and geopolymeric binders are formed, which are a good alternative to cementitious systems. 4,6,[10][11][12] In this context, the best-studied aluminosilicate feedstocks are fly ash, ground blast furnace slags, and silica dust. [13][14][15][16] Because fly ash has already been so extensively studied in this context, this feedstock was used as the reference material for the present investigations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alumina and silica‐rich materials (i.e., aluminosilicates) such as fly ash, blast furnace slags, or silica dusts were used. By combining these starting materials with strong alkali solutions, they are activated and geopolymeric binders are formed, which are a good alternative to cementitious systems 4,6,10–12 . In this context, the best‐studied aluminosilicate feedstocks are fly ash, ground blast furnace slags, and silica dust 13–16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its large demand, even small reductions of greenhouse gas emissions per ton of manufactured concrete can make a significant global impact. Since the production of 1 ton of OPC implies the emission of about 0.5 tons of carbon dioxide and an intensive use of energy, the easiest solution to reduce the environmental impact of construction industry is shifting to alternative cementitious binders [16,17]. In recent years geopolymers, also called alkali-activated cements (AAC), are emerging as promising cementitious materials to provide an environmentally friendly alternative to OPC, since the production of raw materials is less polluting and energy-intensive than OPC [16,18,19,20,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the production of 1 ton of OPC implies the emission of about 0.5 tons of carbon dioxide and an intensive use of energy, the easiest solution to reduce the environmental impact of construction industry is shifting to alternative cementitious binders [16,17]. In recent years geopolymers, also called alkali-activated cements (AAC), are emerging as promising cementitious materials to provide an environmentally friendly alternative to OPC, since the production of raw materials is less polluting and energy-intensive than OPC [16,18,19,20,21,22]. In particular, from the comparison of the life cycle assessment (LCA) studies present in literature, Habert and Oullet-Plamondon concluded that AAC can reduce global warming potential (GWP), i.e., the environmental impact category related to greenhouse gases emissions, by a factor of 4 compared to OPC [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%