2013
DOI: 10.1086/669964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Borrowing Constraints, College Enrollment, and Delayed Entry

Abstract: In this paper I propose and estimate a dynamic model of education, borrowing, and work decisions of high school graduates. I examine the effect of relaxing borrowing constraints on educational attainment by simulating increases in the amount students are permitted to borrow from government sponsored loan programs. My results indicate that borrowing constraints have a small impact on * I am grateful to my advisors Joe Altonji, Melissa Tartari, and Fabian Lange for their guidance. I thank Peter Arcidiacono, Bjoe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
117
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
13
117
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, like Keane and Wolpin (2001) and Johnson (2010), our model suggests that there would be little impact on human capital investment ('early' or 'late') from relaxing borrowing constraints on college-age youth or older parents. At least in the short-run, relaxing constraints on young parents would substantially increase both 'early' investments in young children and 'late' investments in older children (e.g.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, like Keane and Wolpin (2001) and Johnson (2010), our model suggests that there would be little impact on human capital investment ('early' or 'late') from relaxing borrowing constraints on college-age youth or older parents. At least in the short-run, relaxing constraints on young parents would substantially increase both 'early' investments in young children and 'late' investments in older children (e.g.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This step requires fully solving the dynastic fixed point problem of Section 3 in steady state, simulating a number of conditional moment conditions, and comparing those moments with their empirical counterparts. In particular, we fit moments related to (i) the education distribution, (ii) the distribution of annual earnings for men ages 24-35 and 36-47 in the NLSY79, (iii) child schooling levels conditional on parental income and maternal schooling, and (iv) child wages at ages [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] conditional on their own educational attainment, maternal schooling, and parental income levels (when the child is ages 0-11). Appendix C provides greater detail on the calibration.…”
Section: Calibrating Other Parameters Using Simulated Methods Of Momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gale and Scholz (1994) show that inter vivos transfers (IVTs) for education are sizeable, thus they should be incorporated into models of education acquisition. Keane and Wolpin (2001) and Johnson (2011) estimate parental IVTs as a function of observable characteristics from the NLSY79. Brown, Scholz, and Seshadri (2012) show that while parental contributions are assumed and expected in financial aid packages they are not legally enforceable nor universally given, implying substantial heterogeneity in access to resources for students with observationally similar families.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%