2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00758-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone vs Thalidomide, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone in Myeloma patients presenting with renal failure (OPTIMAL): a randomised, multi-centre phase II trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Partly due to premature closure of the trial, which itself is an expression of the challenges recruiting this population, especially after approval and wide availability of the triplet regimen, the patient number was limited. The challenge to recruit patients with severe RI into clinical trials was recently also documented by Ramasamy et al who reported 57 screen failures out of 88 screened patients for their OPTIMAL trial for newly diagnosed MM patients presenting with renal failure [ 24 ]. In OPTIMAL, most screen failure were due to frailty of the patients [ 24 ], again highlighting the special need of this specific population, and possibly contributing to the lack of attractiveness to include these patients into clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Partly due to premature closure of the trial, which itself is an expression of the challenges recruiting this population, especially after approval and wide availability of the triplet regimen, the patient number was limited. The challenge to recruit patients with severe RI into clinical trials was recently also documented by Ramasamy et al who reported 57 screen failures out of 88 screened patients for their OPTIMAL trial for newly diagnosed MM patients presenting with renal failure [ 24 ]. In OPTIMAL, most screen failure were due to frailty of the patients [ 24 ], again highlighting the special need of this specific population, and possibly contributing to the lack of attractiveness to include these patients into clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge to recruit patients with severe RI into clinical trials was recently also documented by Ramasamy et al who reported 57 screen failures out of 88 screened patients for their OPTIMAL trial for newly diagnosed MM patients presenting with renal failure [ 24 ]. In OPTIMAL, most screen failure were due to frailty of the patients [ 24 ], again highlighting the special need of this specific population, and possibly contributing to the lack of attractiveness to include these patients into clinical trials. In addition, at the time of the conception of the GMMG-DANTE trial, assessments of minimal residual disease (MRD) were not yet widely available, so data on MRD negativity could not be collected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies with small numbers of patients suggest that treatment with new substances and/or conventional chemotherapy results in recovery of renal function in more than 50% of the cases (Dimopoulos et al 2009;Roussou et al 2010;Dimopoulos et al 2016). An example of the use of the new drugs is the combination of bortezomib with bendamustine and corticosteroids, which has been assessed in several studies in the rst line setting (Pönisch et al 2014;Mateos et al 2015;Berdeja et al 2017;Ramasamy et al 2022). The combination of bendamustine, prednisone and bortezomib (Velcade®) (BPV) was particularly effective in 18 MM patients with severe renal insu ciency with a hematological overall response rate (ORR) of 83% and an improvement of renal function in 72% (Pönisch et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%