“Boss ceiling effect”: brand downgrading consumption of workplace employees

Abstract

Purpose Previous literature suggests that people might purchase symbolic products to signal their social identity. However, in the organizational context, subordinates as customers might choose products with less brand prestige than what they want and can afford, just to make sure their choices are below the invisible “red-line” set by the brands of their supervisors. The authors term the phenomenon as “boss ceiling effect,” and term the behavior that people often downgrade their original choice to make sure the brand prestige is lower than that of the product owned by their boss as “downgrading behavior,” which have not been explored and well explained by existing literature so far. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach The authors conduct qualitative study to explore the existence of boss ceiling effect and providing possible influential factors of brand downgrading attitude. The quantitative study empirically examines the relationships among undesired self, perceived risk, organizational culture balance, and downgrading attitude and intension. Findings The authors find that undesired self-congruence and perceived risk are positively related to the downgrading attitude. In addition, the culture balance directly affects the brand downgrading attitude negatively and also moderates the relationship between undesired self-congruence and downgrading attitude positively and the relationship between perceived risk and downgrading attitude negatively. Originality/value The authors contribute to both organizational culture research and symbolic consumption research by considering symbolic consumption behavior in organization context. It is of great practical implications for marketers of symbolic consumption to understand the downgrading behavior.

‘New’ Luxury or Off-Canon Luxury: A Compendium for the Changing Definition of Classical Luxury

“…sharing a photo with a branded luxury item on social media, where the brand appears vaguely, with a caption unrelated to the brand) (Chen et al, 2021a). That depicts the situation of a person denying to consume prestigious brands near their superiors ('boss ceiling effect') is another example of the changing definition of conspicuous luxury consumption (Jia et al, 2019). New luxury's prominent experience dimension could be handled in a wide range from having a nice meal outside or drinking a nice bottle of wine, to traveling luxurious exotic locations or owning a luxury boat (Madan, 2018).…”

“…Although the coexistence of the words sustainability and luxury is an oxymoron for many people, an increasing number of managers in the luxury industry started to pay attention to environmental and working conditions (Kahn, 2009). Sustainable development's nature prioritizing social and economic cohesion is seen as the reason for this perception of conflict (Kapferer & Michaut-Denizeau, 2014).…”

“Income vs. education” revisited – the roles of “family face” and gender in Chinese consumers' luxury consumption

“…As in the interview we mentioned earlier, certain luxury goods are regarded as “must haves” at a certain age. Very likely, this “must have” thought is derived from social influence such as “listening to others” (Chen and Li, 2019) and social comparison (Jia et al , 2019; Li et al , 2019), especially in Confucian culture. Western female luxury brands tend to project an ideal female imagery that highlights a free self-expression that is not easily swayed by social opinions (Yin et al , 2019).…”