1984
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4181(84)90025-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boston and Grimsby in the middle ages: an administrative contrast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…fearlessly and manfully assert their independence' and to 'shake off the iron fetters of Brocklesby'. 64 Within the municipal elite, a boat builder and a timber merchant were the sole representatives of industry and commerce. 57 The major impetus behind Worsley's nomination came from the erstwhile Yarborough retinue within the borough 58 rather than Brocklesby Hall and despite the ease of his victories, the new member was viewed with considerable scepticism by an electorate whose agenda was becoming increasingly commercial.…”
Section: Railway Hegemonymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fearlessly and manfully assert their independence' and to 'shake off the iron fetters of Brocklesby'. 64 Within the municipal elite, a boat builder and a timber merchant were the sole representatives of industry and commerce. 57 The major impetus behind Worsley's nomination came from the erstwhile Yarborough retinue within the borough 58 rather than Brocklesby Hall and despite the ease of his victories, the new member was viewed with considerable scepticism by an electorate whose agenda was becoming increasingly commercial.…”
Section: Railway Hegemonymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Petitioning was a ubiquitous practice throughout Europe across different types of polities. 20 The exclusion of the commons and the first electoral reforms carried out by the crown in response to such protests are well documented in towns such as Laredo, Santander, Vitoria, Deba and Bilbao during the early fifteenth century, specifically between 1420 and 1440. The leaders of the movement argued that they were 'rich men of great properties, good fame and very well qualified', who 'represented the common good and the defence of the urban community'.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The towns which battled against their monastic lords for greater autonomy included not only relatively small places such as Cirencester (Gloucestershire), but also Bury St. Edmunds, the chief town of west Suffolk and a considerable centre of cloth manufacture. 38 Seigniorial rule was often conducted in a spirit of compromise whereby the lord was content that the leading townspeople served as bailiffs and jurors in the court. The individuals put in charge were in effect those who would have been the natural choice as mayors and aldermen in a privileged town.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%