2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-19810-7_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bot Detection on Online Social Networks Using Deep Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their proposed architecture achieved 96% AUC score in bot detection. [52] 2019 Deep Forest Algorithm Dataset collected from the Twitter timeline(API)…”
Section: Deepfake Text Generation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their proposed architecture achieved 96% AUC score in bot detection. [52] 2019 Deep Forest Algorithm Dataset collected from the Twitter timeline(API)…”
Section: Deepfake Text Generation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deep Q-network architecture designed by Lingam et al [28] showed approximately 5-20% improvement of precision, recall, F1-score and G-measures over the baseline algorithms (FFNN, RDNN, SNA-DRL, C-DRL and ADQL), from a combination of tweet-based, user profilebased and social graph-based features. The deep forest algorithm proposed by Daouadi et al [58] yielded an accuracy of 97.55% information from the metadata of user profiles and posts, which was * 2% higher than the RF model and outperformed other traditional ML algorithms such as bagging (B), AdaBoost (AB), random forest (RF) and simple logistic (SL), in terms of AUC measures.…”
Section: Comparison Between DL and Traditional Ml Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…? and DenStream) [58] and generic statistical approaches in [59]. Kudugunta and Ferrara [33] showed a detailed comparison of their proposed contextual LSTM architecture performance for social media bot detection at tweet level, with a number of ML methods.…”
Section: Comparison Between DL and Traditional Ml Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These methods employ machine learning classifiers to detect malicious SMBs, treating the detection as binary classification and relying on a substantial amount of annotated data for training. Daouadi et al [13] proposed an augmented set of features that leverage the interaction volume between accounts, combined with other features from previous research, to detect bot accounts on Twitter. Kudugunta et al [14] employed the content of individual tweets and six account features to identify bots on Twitter.…”
Section: Node-based Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%