2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Both familiarity and kinship influence odour discrimination by females in a highly social African ground squirrel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Cape ground squirrels live and forage in family groups and spatially their closest callers will be their family members (close kin; Waterman & Archibald, 2019), who would be predicted to be more reliable for inclusive fitness reasons (Hare, 1998;Matrosova et al, 2011;Pollard, 2011;Pollard & Blumstein, 2012). In our experiment, we did not find an effect of the number of squirrels within 15 m on response, in contrast to Edwards and Waterman (2011), who found that group size affected levels of vigilance.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, Cape ground squirrels live and forage in family groups and spatially their closest callers will be their family members (close kin; Waterman & Archibald, 2019), who would be predicted to be more reliable for inclusive fitness reasons (Hare, 1998;Matrosova et al, 2011;Pollard, 2011;Pollard & Blumstein, 2012). In our experiment, we did not find an effect of the number of squirrels within 15 m on response, in contrast to Edwards and Waterman (2011), who found that group size affected levels of vigilance.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Cape ground squirrels produce alarm calls in the presence of predators (Furrer & Manser, 2009) and one benefit of grouping in this species is collective detection, which requires the use of alarm calls to warn group members of danger (Edwards & Waterman, 2011). In addition, Cape ground squirrels live and forage in family groups and spatially their closest callers will be their family members (close kin; Waterman & Archibald, 2019), who would be predicted to be more reliable for inclusive fitness reasons (Hare, 1998; Matrosova et al., 2011; Pollard, 2011; Pollard & Blumstein, 2012). In our experiment, we did not find an effect of the number of squirrels within 15 m on response, in contrast to Edwards and Waterman (2011), who found that group size affected levels of vigilance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ref. 42 44 ), we demonstrated that spiny mice recognize novel kin from novel non-kin; additionally, we showed that males differentially investigate bodily locations of conspecifics based on identity. Further, in a novel group interaction and in dyadic interactions, males preferentially affiliate and engage in prosocial behaviors with novel kin over novel non-kin and familiar kin, suggesting that a general drive to affiliate with novel relatives may have evolved to promote group cohesion in communally breeding species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%