2014
DOI: 10.1080/03122417.2014.11682025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Both half right:Updating the evidence for dating first human arrivals in Sahul

Abstract: This paper updates our previous analyses of the evidence for the timing of human arrival in Sahul. It reviews advances in dating technologies, summarises new data for sites published a decade ago or earlier, and examines the evidence from sites published since 2004. Extensions in time for first arrival can be attributed to improvements in both luminescence and radiocarbon dating techniques and especially the refinement of 14 C calibration. The similarity of the ages of the earliest dates and their consistency … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
3
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is generally accepted that people were widespread over the continent by 45 ka or a few millennia earlier [13,14,27,28]. There is as yet no obvious geographical pattern in first-appearance dates to indicate the progress of a wave of colonization across Sahul.…”
Section: Human Arrivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is generally accepted that people were widespread over the continent by 45 ka or a few millennia earlier [13,14,27,28]. There is as yet no obvious geographical pattern in first-appearance dates to indicate the progress of a wave of colonization across Sahul.…”
Section: Human Arrivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we still have few dated sites from the earliest phase of the prehistory of Sahul. Only 20 archaeological sites have been dated to 40 ka or older [14]; for comparison, the archaeological record in Australia consists of 1748 dated sites [29]. Most of the arid centre lacks evidence of human occupation until just after 40 ka [30], but whether this truly indicates late settlement rather than poor preservation and limited sampling is unclear.…”
Section: Human Arrivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This chapter benefited from input and comments from my friend Ian Hamilton, Sally May (Griffith University), Susanne Schech (Flinders University), the editors of this publication Paul Taçon and Bruno David and independent reviewers. et al 1990a:153, 1998Allen and O'Connell 2014;Clarkson et al 2017). Yet little is known of its extensive body of rock art.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%