2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/roman.2017.8172294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Both “look and feel” matter: Essential factors for robotic companionship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Robots designed specifically and exclusively to interact socially with humans for a prolonged period of time and to provide companionship (e.g., a study investigates attitudes towards the robots NAO and Darwin; [42]); or robots that are designed to help with domestic chores, as well as provide social interaction (e.g., a study investigating the evaluation of a socially assistive robot in a smart home setting; [43]); Education Robots Designed to assist educators with teaching and social interaction with students (e.g., a study investigating how students evaluate the use of NAO to teach English lessons; [44]). Healthcare Robots designed to help patients, doctors or healthcare providers (e.g., a study investigating the attitudes and preferences of staff, residents, and relatives of residents in a retirement village towards a health-care robot; [2]).…”
Section: Companion Robotics and Domestic Assistancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Robots designed specifically and exclusively to interact socially with humans for a prolonged period of time and to provide companionship (e.g., a study investigates attitudes towards the robots NAO and Darwin; [42]); or robots that are designed to help with domestic chores, as well as provide social interaction (e.g., a study investigating the evaluation of a socially assistive robot in a smart home setting; [43]); Education Robots Designed to assist educators with teaching and social interaction with students (e.g., a study investigating how students evaluate the use of NAO to teach English lessons; [44]). Healthcare Robots designed to help patients, doctors or healthcare providers (e.g., a study investigating the attitudes and preferences of staff, residents, and relatives of residents in a retirement village towards a health-care robot; [2]).…”
Section: Companion Robotics and Domestic Assistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding may, to a certain extent, be a product of the general tendency for social robots to be designed in such a way as to appear less threatening. For example, NAO, a generally well-liked robot [42,78,79], was used in 45% of the studies measuring anxiety and may have contributed to the overall neutral to positive valence for anxiety and trust.…”
Section: To What Extent Do People Accept Trust and Feel Anxious Towmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People showed a tendency to prefer interacting with robots similar to themselves in voice characteristics, including human-like speech style and accent, and gender (Eyssel et al, 2012). Hosseini et al (2017) emphasized the importance of anthropomorphism in both appearances and voice styles. Their study showed that only when the robot both looks human-like and speaks with emotional expressions, did participants perceive the robot as a social companion.…”
Section: Verbal Emotional Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially important in a case when a person uses a system in a long term, i.e., service robots for older adults and artificial nannies for kids [46]. Moreover, research shows that people are more open to system's suggestions if it uses emotional words [47]. This leads to conclusion that a user would be more interested to engage with a system if it would fulfill their emotional expectations as a result supporting the main functions of AAL as well.…”
Section: Emotions As Part Of Aal In the Social Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%