Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3487351.3488336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BotRGCN

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Seyed et al [18] firstly apply graph convolutional neural networks to learn one node's representation based on account features of itself and its neighbors. Shangbin et al [19] applied GCN algorithm on the user following relationship graph, then represented raw node features including user profile, categorical and numerical data of account activity. Shangbin et al [20] constructs two kinds of heterogeneity structures, including relation and influence, leveraging the topology to identify the difference between genuine users and social bots.…”
Section: Bot Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seyed et al [18] firstly apply graph convolutional neural networks to learn one node's representation based on account features of itself and its neighbors. Shangbin et al [19] applied GCN algorithm on the user following relationship graph, then represented raw node features including user profile, categorical and numerical data of account activity. Shangbin et al [20] constructs two kinds of heterogeneity structures, including relation and influence, leveraging the topology to identify the difference between genuine users and social bots.…”
Section: Bot Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest GNN-based social bot detection method [22] primarily combined graph convolutional neural networks (GCNs) with multi-layer perception and belief propagation. By constructing heterogeneous graphs and extracting original node features using pre-trained language models to obtain initial node embeddings, followed by aggregation of R-GCN models, BotRGCN [7] demonstrated superior performance compared to conventional detection models on the TwiBot-20 [23], which is a recently released benchmark dataset for social bot detection. Another method proposed in [6] applied heterogeneous graphs and introduced a relational graph converter influenced by natural language processing to model user fusion and learn node representations for improved social bots detection, outperforming BotRGCN.…”
Section: Gnn-based Social Bot Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latest progress in graph neural networks (GNNs) [5] has facilitated a more comprehensive understanding of the implicit relation between bot users and legitimate users, thereby increasing the complexity of detection. GNN-based methods [6,7] represent the detection process as a node classification problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bot account detection on Twitter is a challenging task due to the bots' increasing sophistication. Studies towards this direction make use of supervised ((Efthimion, Payne, and Proferes 2018;Feng et al 2021a;Kantepe and Ganiz 2017;Ng, Robertson, and Carley 2022;Rodríguez-Ruiz et al 2020;Abreu, Ralha, and Gondim 2020) or unsupervised ML models ( (Chavoshi, Hamooni, and Mueen 2016;Minnich et al 2017;Anwar and Yaqub 2020;Chen et al 2017;Chen 2018;Wei and Nguyen 2019;Feng et al 2021b;Antonakaki, Fragopoulou, and Ioannidis 2021)), deep neural networks (Kudugunta and Ferrara 2018;Cai, Li, and Zengi 2017;Ilias and Roussaki 2021;Luo et al 2020;Hayawi et al 2022;Feng et al 2021c;Ping and Qin 2018), language agnostic models ((Knauth 2019), word embeddings (Wei and Nguyen 2019;Feng et al 2021c;Cai, Li, and Zengi 2017;Heidari, Jones, and Uzuner 2020), explainable ML (Kouvela, Dimitriadis, and Vakali 2020) and ensemble ML (Shukla, Jagtap, and Patil 2021).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%