2013
DOI: 10.1167/13.3.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent

Abstract: What is the relationship between top-down and bottom-up attention? Are both types of attention tightly interconnected, or are they independent? We investigated this by testing a large representative sample of the Dutch population on two attentional tasks: a visual search task gauging the efficiency of top-down attention and a singleton capture task gauging bottom-up attention. On both tasks we found typical performance--i.e., participants displayed a significant search slope on the search task and significant … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
109
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
(99 reference statements)
5
109
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From a cognitive processing point of view, voluntary allocation requires top-down control, which presumably takes extra processing time. In studies of selective attention, for example, it is known that it takes more time to deploy top-down attention than bottom-up attention (Jonides, 1981; Liu, Stevens, & Carrasco, 2007; Muller & Rabbitt, 1989; Pinto, van der Leij, Sligte, Lamme, & Scholte, 2013). From an information theoretical point of view, the involuntary phase can maximize the storage of information with little cost of control, thus providing an efficient mechanism for consolidation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a cognitive processing point of view, voluntary allocation requires top-down control, which presumably takes extra processing time. In studies of selective attention, for example, it is known that it takes more time to deploy top-down attention than bottom-up attention (Jonides, 1981; Liu, Stevens, & Carrasco, 2007; Muller & Rabbitt, 1989; Pinto, van der Leij, Sligte, Lamme, & Scholte, 2013). From an information theoretical point of view, the involuntary phase can maximize the storage of information with little cost of control, thus providing an efficient mechanism for consolidation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuroscientific understanding is that there are two distinct sensory processing pathways that exist in primate brains which are correlated with different forms of attention and these forms of attention are known as top-down (focused) and bottom-up (receptive) (e.g., AUSTIN, 2009;PINTO et al, 2013). These processing pathways are physical neural circuits located, respectively, in the dorsal and ventral regions of the brain (e.g., AUSTIN, 2009;KRAVITZ et al, 2011).…”
Section: Neuroscience Of Attention: Outline Of Theory Of Sensory Procmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This MWS framework gives a way to track transition from perceptual geometry to deductive geometry through identifying how a learner's experience is processed through the links (geneses) of tool use, imagery or language (i.e., respectively: instrumental genesis, figural genesis or discursive genesis; KUZNIAK 2015). A contribution to this framework presented in this paper is to specialise the notion of top-down attention (e.g., PINTO et al, 2013;AUSTIN 2009) for circumstances in which tool use, imagery and language are processed together in 'near-to-me' geometrical work. By conceptualising 'nearto-me' attention in terms of attention-processing pathways, an explanation for a learner's transition from "it looks like" to "it has to be" can be offered which integrates influences of emotion and other affects into their spaces of geometrical work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, many significant medical advances have been made over the years in the field of human vision, many critical questions relating to scene understanding based on hierarchical visual processing remain unequivocally unanswered by the research community (Amano et al 2006;Diamant 2008). For example, the three schools-of-thought on hierarchical visual processing are the bottom-up, topbottom and hybrid paradigms (McMains and Kastner 2011;Pinto et al 2013;Graboi and Lisman 2013). In the bottomup approach, hierarchical processing is conceived to be achieved through the sequential aggregation of primary scene features to more defined features and then finally to the object which is recognized (Itti et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%