2008
DOI: 10.3354/meps07697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bottom-up and top-down control of heterotrophic bacterioplankton growth in a phosphorus-depleted subtropical estuary, Florida Bay, USA

Abstract: The influences of resources (carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus) and protist bacterivory on heterotrophic bacterioplankton growth rates were investigated at 4 sampling sites in the subtropical Florida Bay seagrass estuary during 3 seasons, summer 2004, winter 2005, and fall 2006. Bacterial growth and grazing mortality rates were determined by dilution experiments and flow cytometry, where bacterial communities were separated into high and low DNA content populations (HDNA and LDNA, respectively). In addition, me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such oligotrophic environments, LNA cells are therefore an important dynamic group, whose role in the microbial communities and in C cycling is far from negligible. This agrees with other studies showing that significant growth rates, sometimes equal to those of HNA cells, were also measured in LNA cells (Scharek and Latasa, 2007;Williams et al, 2008). LNA cells were found to be active members of the Hprok community, not only in terms of protein synthesis, but also in cell division, as shown in groups sorted following thymidine incorporation (Longnecker et al, 2006).…”
Section: Importance Of Lna Cells In the Leucine Incorporation Ratessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In such oligotrophic environments, LNA cells are therefore an important dynamic group, whose role in the microbial communities and in C cycling is far from negligible. This agrees with other studies showing that significant growth rates, sometimes equal to those of HNA cells, were also measured in LNA cells (Scharek and Latasa, 2007;Williams et al, 2008). LNA cells were found to be active members of the Hprok community, not only in terms of protein synthesis, but also in cell division, as shown in groups sorted following thymidine incorporation (Longnecker et al, 2006).…”
Section: Importance Of Lna Cells In the Leucine Incorporation Ratessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…6), as previously reported by Williams et al (2008). However, recent work indicates that gross growth rates of HNA cells are frequently 1 order of magnitude higher than those of LNA cells: differences of 3-to 5-fold higher values were reported in direct comparisons of HNA versus LNA bacteria ) and of phylo genetic groups ascribed to one or the other flow cytometric clusters (Teira et al 2009, Ferrera et al 2011.…”
Section: Lna and Hna Bacterial Apparent Net Growth Ratesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…LNA cells were not correlated to changes in grazing rate in experimental or in situ samples (Vaqué et al 2001). However, LNA cells can be grazed at rates which are higher than or equal to (Jochem et al 2004, Scharek & Latasa 2007 as well as lower than (Williams et al 2008) the grazing rates for HNA cells. What causes the different response of protist grazers to LNA cells is not yet clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%