2012
DOI: 10.3354/meps09710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bottom-up effects of climate on fish populations: data from the Continuous Plankton Recorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the larval stages, uptake rates and half saturation constants of herbivorous zooplankton uptake by fish larvae (s28, s29, s38, s39), together with the proportion of this uptake converted to fish biomass (s80, s81) were identified as influential. Although the direct effects of temperature on fish are well documented, North Sea larval fish populations are probably influenced by climate indirectly through bottom-up effects impacting on plankton availability (Alvarez-Fernandez et al, 2012;Pitois et al, 2012). Therefore the model appears to reflect this distinction through the influence of factors relating to the uptake and conversion of herbivorous zooplankton rather than temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the larval stages, uptake rates and half saturation constants of herbivorous zooplankton uptake by fish larvae (s28, s29, s38, s39), together with the proportion of this uptake converted to fish biomass (s80, s81) were identified as influential. Although the direct effects of temperature on fish are well documented, North Sea larval fish populations are probably influenced by climate indirectly through bottom-up effects impacting on plankton availability (Alvarez-Fernandez et al, 2012;Pitois et al, 2012). Therefore the model appears to reflect this distinction through the influence of factors relating to the uptake and conversion of herbivorous zooplankton rather than temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences observed between the total and first order sensitivity indices of the fishing rates concurred with this, indicating that within the model, fishing was very influential but interactions with other factors did occur to produce the resultant outputs. Previous studies have highlighted the difficulties inherent in identifying possible impacts of environmental change on North Sea fisheries due to the effects that commercial fishing has on demersal and pelagic fish numbers (Pitois et al, 2012). By fixing fishing rates in the StrathE2E model, the impacts of factors associated with environmental change could be further explored to identify their relative importance assessed for the fish stocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly we attempt to identify regimes with defined environmental conditions and second, to identify potential linkages between the environment and fish larvae. We then compare our results with those obtained from the North Sea by Pitois et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The value of the CPR fish larvae dataset, with its extensive spatio-temporal coverage, has been recently demonstrated with studies on longterm changes over decadal scales in the abundance and distribution of fish larvae in relation to physical and biological factors (Pitois et al, 2012), on blue-whiting populations in the North Atlantic (Pointin and Payne, 2014), and on the use of a larval index to inform stock assessments for sandeels (Lynam et al, 2013) and mackerel (Jansen et al, 2012b) in the North Sea. Analyses in the North Sea (Pitois et al, 2012) suggest that the larvae of clupeids, sandeels, dab and gadoids seem to be affected mainly by changes in the plankton ecosystem via bottom-up effects, while the larvae of migratory species such as mackerel respond more to hydrographic influences. Here we use a similar approach to this previous work and focus on the larvae of mackerel collected by the CPR in the west and southwest of the British Isles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pelagic ecosystems, zooplankton occupy a central position in the food web, often controlling smaller organisms by grazing and providing food for many important larval and adult fish and ultimately seabirds (Pitois et al, 2012;Lauria et al, 2013). Their short life cycle render zooplankton sensitive to environmental changes (Edwards and Richardson, 2004;Beaugrand et al, 2010;Harris and Edwards, 2014;Serranito et al, 2016), and their position in the food chain between primary producer (bottom-up control) and fish (top-down control), make them a prerequisite for an understanding of ecosystem approach to management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%