2007
DOI: 10.1109/tkde.2007.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bottom-Up Extraction and Trust-Based Refinement of Ontology Metadata

Abstract: Abstract-We present a way of building ontologies that proceeds in a bottom-up fashion, defining concepts as clusters of concrete XML objects. Our rough bottom-up ontologies are based on simple relations like association and inheritance, as well as on value restrictions, and can be used to enrich and update existing upper ontologies. Then, we show how automatically generated assertions based on our bottom-up ontologies can be associated with a flexible degree of trust by nonintrusively collecting user feedback … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for future directions, first of all, we plan to study further DISARM's performance by comparing it to more reputation models from the literature and use it in real-world applications, combining it also with Semantic Web metadata for trust [10,11]. Another direction is towards improving DISARM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for future directions, first of all, we plan to study further DISARM's performance by comparing it to more reputation models from the literature and use it in real-world applications, combining it also with Semantic Web metadata for trust [10,11]. Another direction is towards improving DISARM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the "right" weighting to use may be application and even data-set dependent. Nevertheless, it can be compared and adjusted with respect to users perceptions, e.g., by having the user to provide weights for the schema items [30]. In our framework, this is ensured via a function called distribute-weight.…”
Section: Supporting Flexibility In Matching Tree Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods of evaluating the similarity between ontology entities have been studied widely [3] [10]. Many different matching solutions have been proposed so far from various viewpoints, e.g., databases, information systems, and artificial intelligence.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mapping from OWL description onto resource space includes: mapping inheritance hierarchy onto inheritance axis, mapping properties onto property axes, and mapping individuals onto resources [13]. To measure the similarity between two resource spaces, first of all, we should distinguish two kinds of axes in resource spaces, they are property axes and concept axes 3 . Moreover, the property axes can be further classified into object properties axes and datatype axes.…”
Section: B Similarity Of Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation