2003
DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2003.003415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bottom-up or top-down? Evolutionary change management in NPD processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond their individual performance effect, we argue that there is a complementary effect; a superadditive effect such that an increase in either aspect amplifies the benefits of the other aspect. Following studies that highlight the benefits of managing both the deliberate and emergent elements concurrently (Burgelman, 1991;Hart, 1992;Hutchison-Krupat and Kavadias, 2015;Smeds et al, 2003) we propose a positive interaction between deliberate strategy implementation and emerging strategy recognition. there is a positive interaction effect.…”
Section: Emerging Strategy Recognition and Project Portfolio Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond their individual performance effect, we argue that there is a complementary effect; a superadditive effect such that an increase in either aspect amplifies the benefits of the other aspect. Following studies that highlight the benefits of managing both the deliberate and emergent elements concurrently (Burgelman, 1991;Hart, 1992;Hutchison-Krupat and Kavadias, 2015;Smeds et al, 2003) we propose a positive interaction between deliberate strategy implementation and emerging strategy recognition. there is a positive interaction effect.…”
Section: Emerging Strategy Recognition and Project Portfolio Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two approaches are very closely aligned with knowledge flow and structure of authority inherent in an organization. Smeds, Haho, and Alvesalo (2003) did a study that looked at change management in two diverse settings, pharmaceutical and telecommunications, where both top-down and bottom-up change management approaches were used. They agreed that the two approaches worked well in their case study organizations because of the dialogue which the change management program initiated between strategy and operations.…”
Section: Grounded Theory Literature Review Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It enables the conversion of the participants' tacit process knowledge into shared explicit knowledge. (e.g., Smeds et al 2003, Feller et al 2005.…”
Section: Research Approach and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%