2011
DOI: 10.1117/1.3584837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bound-abrasive grinding and polishing of surfaces of optical materials

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As well as for any brittle nonmetallic material, the diamond grinding of ceramic products, in particular from silicon carbide, is radically different from the abrasive grinding of metals [7][8][9]. When the diamond grinding brittle nonmetallic materials, there are an elastic-plastic deformation without breaking, as well dispersing the machining allowance at plastic deformation and brittle breaking the material with particle chipping.…”
Section: Features Of Surface Layer Forming In Ceramic Products From Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well as for any brittle nonmetallic material, the diamond grinding of ceramic products, in particular from silicon carbide, is radically different from the abrasive grinding of metals [7][8][9]. When the diamond grinding brittle nonmetallic materials, there are an elastic-plastic deformation without breaking, as well dispersing the machining allowance at plastic deformation and brittle breaking the material with particle chipping.…”
Section: Features Of Surface Layer Forming In Ceramic Products From Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on a cluster model of frictional wear of solids and a physical statistical model of formation of debris particles and their removal from the workpiece surface [16][17][18][19][20]. The calculation of workpiece material removal rate Q in polishing involves the use of machining process parameters (the workpiece to pad contact pressure, the velocities of the workpiece and pad relative motions, the contact area between the workpiece and the polishing pad, the contact temperatures) and characteristics of the workpiece material and polishing pow der (the thermal conductivity coefficient of the workpiece material, the debris particle surface area, the mean size of polishing powder grains) and is carried out by the formula [1,3] …”
Section: Removal Rate In Polishing Monocrystalline Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the dimen sionless parameter; λ is the thermal conductivity coefficient of the workpiece material; T is the contact tem perature; p is the nominal workpiece to pad contact pressure; u is the velocity of the workpiece and pad rela tive motions [1,3,16,17,20]. The number of the ith debris particles on the surface area S i during the contact between the polishing grain and the workpiece surface t c = d/u was determined, in view of their distribution over the surface areas, by the formula ,…”
Section: Removal Rate In Polishing Monocrystalline Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, loose abrasive polishing requires an extremely large amount of slurry supplied continually, resulting in the cost increase not only for the cleaning of equipments and workpieces but also for the treatment of waste slurry. In order to reduce the time of polishing and decrease the supplying volume of slurry, considerable emphasis has been predominantly placed on two aspects: one is to thin the thickness of the damaged layer as possible by ductile mode grinding [2,3]; the other refers to raise the material removal rate in polishing process using fixed abrasive tool [4]. Especially, chemical fixed abrasive polishing technique has attracted attentions from many researchers as viewed from the polishing efficiency and surface quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%