2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0928-7655(00)00044-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
101
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
101
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Carson et al (1999) argue that, even using DC elicitation formats, the incentive compatibility properties of CV questions break down once more than one good is offered in a given contingent market. Furthermore, psychological factors and other anomalies may influence responses that are made in reference to previous questions and responses (Bateman et al, 2001(Bateman et al, , 2004. Given this, the findings of H o 3 are essentially an open empirical question.…”
Section: Elicitation Methods and Incentive Compatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carson et al (1999) argue that, even using DC elicitation formats, the incentive compatibility properties of CV questions break down once more than one good is offered in a given contingent market. Furthermore, psychological factors and other anomalies may influence responses that are made in reference to previous questions and responses (Bateman et al, 2001(Bateman et al, , 2004. Given this, the findings of H o 3 are essentially an open empirical question.…”
Section: Elicitation Methods and Incentive Compatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carson et al (1994) also presented that double-bounded dichotomous choice questions yield more information than do single-bounded ones [59]. In the studies of Scarpa and Bateman [56] (2000) and Bateman et al [60] (2001), the inquiry frequency was triple for bidding. Although the triple-bounded dichotomous method increases statistical efficiency, the improvement efficiency is less than 50% compared to that achieved by replacing the single-bounded method by the double-bounded one, or vice versa.…”
Section: Contingent Valuation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have dealt with this issue and have concluded that the DB elicitation method is internally inconsistent in that the hypothesis (that the first and second responses in the DB DC experiment are drawn from the same distribution) can be rejected at the 1% level (e.g., Cameron and Quiggin, 1994;McFadden, 1994). Bateman et al (2001) considered a variety of potential causes of such inconsistencies, tested both the effects caused by moving from SB to DB, and suggested that the responses to the second follow-up DB questions should not be used as the basis of valuation exercises.…”
Section: Elicitation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although each format has both merits and demerits, the SBDC has low statistical efficiency, and the DBDC may manifest a correlation between the responses to the two bids. McFadden (1994), Bateman et al (2001), and Cooper et al (2002) have explicitly dealt with this issue.…”
Section: Elicitation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%