2000
DOI: 10.1006/spmi.2000.0868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundaries, transients and multiple barrier devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For very high values of bias the numerical noise in Wigner function was again absent. As reported earlier, this calculation did not show hysteresis in the dc characteristics [2]. In a supplementary calculation with a device length of 100nm, and the same number of spatial and momentum grid points, the reduction in length resulted in an increased range for the momentum wave vector and a corresponding increase in the spatial resolution.…”
Section: The Physical Model and The Device Equationssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For very high values of bias the numerical noise in Wigner function was again absent. As reported earlier, this calculation did not show hysteresis in the dc characteristics [2]. In a supplementary calculation with a device length of 100nm, and the same number of spatial and momentum grid points, the reduction in length resulted in an increased range for the momentum wave vector and a corresponding increase in the spatial resolution.…”
Section: The Physical Model and The Device Equationssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Given this, what is the best approach to studying transients? The best approach should be ascertained pragmatically; constrained by how much can be done in an acceptable period of time, and the knowledge base. In the past the approach we have taken [1] has included: (i) studies of the quantum hydrodynamic equations, (ii) the density matrix in the coordinate representation, and (iii) the Wigner distribution function [2]. Of the three the weakest is the quantum hydrodynamics derived as quantum corrections [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the peak and valley locations are approximately where expected. It is of interest that our simulations do not show any hysteresis [22]. The reason for the NDR is that as the device is biased, the conduction band (CB) in the contacts begins to sweep past the resonant level inside the well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In recent years increasing attention has been paid to the analysis of the switching behaviour of submicron devices, bringing about the necessity of extending the solution of the Hydrodynamic Model (HD) to the transient case [1,2]. The Hydrodynamic Model in the transient case reads [3]:…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%