2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2004.09325
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary amenability and measure equivalence rigidity among two-dimensional Artin groups of hyperbolic type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
19
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Corollary 5 also shows that right-angled Artin groups are never superrigid for measure equivalence in the strongest possible sense. This is in strong contrast to the situation for some non-right-angled Artin groups with finite outer automorphism groups [HH20], or mapping class groups [Kid10]; this also strongly contrasts with the quasi-isometry superrigidity results obtained by the second named author in [Hua18].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Corollary 5 also shows that right-angled Artin groups are never superrigid for measure equivalence in the strongest possible sense. This is in strong contrast to the situation for some non-right-angled Artin groups with finite outer automorphism groups [HH20], or mapping class groups [Kid10]; this also strongly contrasts with the quasi-isometry superrigidity results obtained by the second named author in [Hua18].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Also, Gaboriau proved that 2 -Betti numbers can be used to obtain measure equivalence invariants [Gab02a]; they have been computed by Davis and Leary for many Artin groups including all the right-angled ones [DL03]. Finally, we comment that Theorem 1 improves a result obtained as a corollary of our previous work on Artin groups [HH20, Corollary 7], where it was established with different techniques under the extra assumption that the defining graphs of the right-angled Artin groups G 1 and G 2 have girth at least 5 -this involved viewing those right-angled Artin groups as 2-dimensional Artin groups of hyperbolic type, and therefore the method in [HH20] cannot be used in the general case.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the Ornstein-Weiss theorem exhibiting a wide class of groups that are indistinguishable from the viewpoint of orbit equivalence, several strong rigidity results have then been obtained for various classes of groups, like higher rank lattices (Furman [Fur99a,Fur99b]), mapping class groups (Kida [Kid10,Kid08]) and related groups (e.g. [CK15]), certain large type Artin groups [HH20a] or Out(F N ) with N ≥ 3 (as proved by Guirardel and the first named author in [GH21]). Interestingly, negative curvature features of the groups under consideration are often key ingredients in the proofs of orbit equivalence rigidity of their ergodic actions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in the mapping class group setting, combining proper proximality with a theorem of Kida [Kid08,Kid10] on orbit equivalence rigidity for ergodic probability measurepreserving actions of Mod(Σ), we derive that the von Neumann algebra L ∞ (X)⋊Mod(Σ) associated to a weakly compact ergodic probability measure-preserving essentially free action of Mod(Σ) recovers the action (up to stable conjugation) among the class of weakly compact actions of countable groups (see Theorem 4.3 for a precise statement). See also [HH20,Section 7.4] for further applications to the context of Artin groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%