2009
DOI: 10.1108/17410380910936774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary choices in the pulp and paper industry

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to shed light on the boundary choices of firms operating in the pulp and paper industry.Design/methodology/approachExplorative interviews were conducted with senior managers of pulp and paper companies, and comparative data on other industries were collected. The theoretical approach was based on extended transaction‐cost economics (TCE).FindingsThe results demonstrate that when company decision makers consider the governance choice for different activities, i.e. make or buy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research might also explore the influence of outsourcing on specific production activities, such as assembly, fabrication, and packaging. Additionally, future research should jointly address value-maximizing and cost-minimizing considerations in specific outsourcing settings, as in Jantunen et al (2009). This study generated additional interesting results pertaining to supplier integration and to IT investments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Future research might also explore the influence of outsourcing on specific production activities, such as assembly, fabrication, and packaging. Additionally, future research should jointly address value-maximizing and cost-minimizing considerations in specific outsourcing settings, as in Jantunen et al (2009). This study generated additional interesting results pertaining to supplier integration and to IT investments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This controversial discussion is very current and relevant for future research. Therefore, we highlight some key findings below: Jantunen et al (2009) conclude their paper by arguing that the TCE statements are not fully sufficient to explain a firm's organization but that the type and strategic relevance of the considered activity also represent an important part of the decision. Cho (2009) finds that distributors attempt to avoid backward integration in the case of high‐quantity fluctuations, country‐specific risk and high‐asset specificity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Possible governance choices are the extremes of market and hierarchy, or any hybrid form between these boundaries. Typical research questions that TCE explains or analyzes are therefore vertical integration questions (Caves and Bradburd, 1988), make‐or‐buy decisions (Hodgkin et al , 1997), questions on contract choice (Kalnins and Mayer, 2004), firm boundary choice questions (Jantunen et al , 2009), governance choice questions (Pangarkar and Klein, 2002; Klein and Saidenberg, 1997) or more general questions on buyer‐supplier relationships (Liker et al , 1996). Transaction costs themselves are dependent on the so‐called transaction dimensions.…”
Section: Transaction Cost Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to improve profitability by a traditional cost minimisation strategy and by exploiting the large economies of scale-based consolidations have not affected significantly. Thus, the sources of competitive advantage must be searched elsewhere and this requires transforming the companies' strategic orientations and operating under so-called 'green economy' (e.g., Jantunen et al, 2009;Jönsson and Berntsson, 2012;Panwar et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Ppi In Briefmentioning
confidence: 99%