1979
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(79)90128-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary conditions at the chip-tool interface in machining: Comparisons between seizure and sliding friction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, validation of these simulations on a global scale remains excessively limited, and is achieved by comparing the cutting forces [3], the shear angle, or the chip morphology [4][5][6]. Post mortem data of the cut (shear angle, chip thickness) are primarily obtained by interrupting the process with a Quick Stop Device [7,8]. This interruption is far from perfect; however, it is assumed that the tool removal has no influence on the obtained results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, validation of these simulations on a global scale remains excessively limited, and is achieved by comparing the cutting forces [3], the shear angle, or the chip morphology [4][5][6]. Post mortem data of the cut (shear angle, chip thickness) are primarily obtained by interrupting the process with a Quick Stop Device [7,8]. This interruption is far from perfect; however, it is assumed that the tool removal has no influence on the obtained results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxygen has a significant influence on cutting mild steel and this is attributed to the reduction of gross adhesion of the chip at the rake face (Rowe and Smart 1963, 1964-1965, 1966-1967Rowe et al 1976). However, apparently anomalous effects have been noted when machining non-ferrous materials such as aluminium and copper, where oxygen seems to increase the cutting forces (Williams 1975;Wright et al 1979;Smart 1966-1967;Doyle et al 1979;Doyle and Horne 1980). This was explained by supposing that the tool would be subjected to the rubbing action of regions of oxide on the chip which might be sufficiently abrasive to remove the contaminant film on the tool resulting in high metallic contact (Williams and Stobbs 1979).…”
Section: Chapter 4 Utilisation Of Environmental Friendly Gaseous and mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the light of earlier studies by one of the present authors and co-workers [2][3][4] and other published results [1], it is proposed to re-examine the friction characteristics at the interface in some detail. It is logical to suggest that there exists a relationship between the bond strength between the chip and tool and the shear stress at the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frictional boundary conditions in machining consist of sticking and sliding interfaces, which show variability in geometry over a period of time during cutting [1]. Cutting parameters and tool and workpiece material behaviours play an important role in this variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%