River Flow 2004 2004
DOI: 10.1201/b16998-49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary conditions between panels in depth-averaged flow models revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the flow depth is discontinuous at the interfaces of main channel and its corresponding floodplains the boundary condition must be reconsidered. Knight et al [16] and Tang and Knight [39] discussed the boundary conditions for the Shiono and Knight Method [31] (hereafter referred as SKM) and discovered that improved results were obtained by using the continuity of depth-averaged shear stress at the interfaces of main channel and floodplain. Furthermore, the turbulent transfer is also an important phenomenon in compound channels and based on mathematical integration, Castanedo et al [4] identified three different forms of the turbulent diffusion term in the depth-averaged Navier-Stokes equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the flow depth is discontinuous at the interfaces of main channel and its corresponding floodplains the boundary condition must be reconsidered. Knight et al [16] and Tang and Knight [39] discussed the boundary conditions for the Shiono and Knight Method [31] (hereafter referred as SKM) and discovered that improved results were obtained by using the continuity of depth-averaged shear stress at the interfaces of main channel and floodplain. Furthermore, the turbulent transfer is also an important phenomenon in compound channels and based on mathematical integration, Castanedo et al [4] identified three different forms of the turbulent diffusion term in the depth-averaged Navier-Stokes equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a more detailed discussion of boundary conditions, and cases where the channel is sub-divided into many panels or sub-areas, with varying f, k and C values, see Knight et al [13], McGahey et al [14] and Abril and Knight [8]. The simplest case is considered here in order to illustrate the method for obtaining the analytic H vs Q relationship and to keep the algebra as simple as possible.…”
Section: Determination Of the Constants Of A 1 A 2 A 3 And A 4 Inmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…and A 1 , A 2 are coefficients (m 2 s À2 ) that are determined by considering the relevant boundary conditions [13]. For a sub-area with a side slope of 1: s (vertical: horizontal) and a variable depth, n, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Basic Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knight et al [15] pointed out that the continuity of ∂U d /∂y, previously used by most researchers [4,12,13] , was only appropriate for certain cases, notably where f and λ are the same in the two adjoining domains.…”
Section: A Non-vegetated Domain With Linearly Varyingmentioning
confidence: 98%