2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2019.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary correspondence of planar domains for isogeometric analysis based on optimal mass transport

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference in this case lies in the value for W; this is very similar for less complex shapes and much worse for the Inpaint technique when highly non convex domains are analyzed. Future work will be devoted to the study of more sophisticated loss functionals for the considered purpose by trying to achieve bijective mappings that have low distortions, see, e.g., [47,48] and to the extension to the non-planar case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference in this case lies in the value for W; this is very similar for less complex shapes and much worse for the Inpaint technique when highly non convex domains are analyzed. Future work will be devoted to the study of more sophisticated loss functionals for the considered purpose by trying to achieve bijective mappings that have low distortions, see, e.g., [47,48] and to the extension to the non-planar case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, one may obtain a patch parameterization as the solution of a suitable PDE, such as in [20], in [21,22] using harmonic functions, or based on a quasi-conformal Teichmüller map as in [23]. The methods in [24,25] are developed using optimal mass transport. Other patch parameterization techniques include, e.g., lowrank parameterizations as in [26], swept volume constructions as in [27] or parameterizations based on offsetting as in [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%