1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-1385-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Element Analysis in Computational Fracture Mechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
199
0
5

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
199
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically this is performed using finite element methods [1,2], boundary element methods [3,4], or boundary collocation of crack-tip stress-field expansions [5]. For the modelling of crack extensions, boundary-type methods have some advantages over domain discretization methods due to the ease in extending the crack front.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically this is performed using finite element methods [1,2], boundary element methods [3,4], or boundary collocation of crack-tip stress-field expansions [5]. For the modelling of crack extensions, boundary-type methods have some advantages over domain discretization methods due to the ease in extending the crack front.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there have been methods based on the quarter-point finite element (Barsoum 1974), the enriched finite element method (Gifford and Hilton 1978), the boundary collocation method (Newman 1971), the integral equation method (Sneddon 1973), the body force method (Nisitani 1985), the boundary elements method (Cruse 1988), and the dislocation method (Chen and Hasebe 1995), plus mesh-free methods such as the element-free Galerkin method (Fleming et al 1997). To avoid remeshing in modeling crack problems, diverse techniques were proposed, including the incorporation of a discontinuous mode on an element level (Oliver 1995), a moving mesh technique (Rashid 1998), and an enrichment technique based on a partition-of-unity X-FEM (Belytschko and Black1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cracked structures on an aircraft could lead to a catastrophic failure because the tensile strengths of composite laminates are significantly reduced when stress concentrations such as cracks and cutouts are present. Solutions to these problems in anisotropic elasticity are therefore of great interest in the design and strength analysis of composite structures [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The Finite Element(FE) and Boundary Element(BE) are the most extensively used methods for the analysis of engineering structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical formulation of the direct BIE for plane anisotropic elasticity may be developed by following the same steps as in the isotropic case [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%