2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.03.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary element and finite element coupling for aeroacoustics simulations

Abstract: We consider the scattering of acoustic perturbations in a presence of a flow. We suppose that the space can be split into a zone where the flow is uniform and a zone where the flow is potential. In the first zone, we apply a Prandtl-Glauert transformation to recover the Helmholtz equation. The well-known setting of boundary element method for the Helmholtz equation is available. In the second zone, the flow quantities are space dependent, we have to consider a local resolution, namely the finite element method… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The boundary conditions of the rigid and lined ducts are represented by transparent boundary conditions suitable for use in a finite element scheme which based on the Dirichlet-to-Neumann (DtN) boundary condition [5]. For particular acoustic domains, [6] has determined the acoustic propagation in a transformed domain by the Prandtl-Glauert transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The boundary conditions of the rigid and lined ducts are represented by transparent boundary conditions suitable for use in a finite element scheme which based on the Dirichlet-to-Neumann (DtN) boundary condition [5]. For particular acoustic domains, [6] has determined the acoustic propagation in a transformed domain by the Prandtl-Glauert transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the finite element method has its limitations in modeling infinite domains. The unbounded medium contains the non-reflection condition which is represented by the Sommerfeld radiation condition in a medium at rest [7] or in a subsonic uniform flow [6]. Using the boundary element method (BEM), which requires a discretization of only the generator of the acoustic domain and that this Sommerfeld condition is automatically fulfilled by the fundamental solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the variable transformation, the physical space is deformed in the direction of the mean flow. The deformation of the domain complicates the formulation of the boundary conditions and the implementation of the transmission conditions for coupled formulations [13,14]. Alternatively, this drawback can be overcome by using an integral formulation in the physical space as proposed by Wu and Lee [15] in the frequency domain and by Hu [16] in the time domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integral representations can be formulated in the transformed acoustic medium [1,2] or in the original acoustic medium [3,4]. However, the advantages of using boundary integral formulations in an untransformed acoustic medium are that the convection effects are explicit and that complex boundary conditions can be handled easily.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JID:CRAS2B AID:3361 /FLA [m3G; v1.159; Prn:29/07/2015; 16:49] P.4(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%