2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2017.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Element Method applied to decision-making problems involving geometric variabilities in topology optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the effectiveness of the DBEM in fracture analysis, it has been extensively used in the research community mainly for problems involving 2D problems. Examples include topology optimisation [1], reliability analysis of structures subjected to fatigue [2], shape optimisation of hydrofoils [3], and the modelling of creep in concrete [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the effectiveness of the DBEM in fracture analysis, it has been extensively used in the research community mainly for problems involving 2D problems. Examples include topology optimisation [1], reliability analysis of structures subjected to fatigue [2], shape optimisation of hydrofoils [3], and the modelling of creep in concrete [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential equation, which is defined over the entire problem domain, is transformed into a surface integral equation over the surfaces that enclosed entirely the problem domain. [13]- [17]. The surface integral equation can then be solved by discrediting the surfaces into smaller regions boundary elements, a major advantage of the boundary element method over the finite element method is that the discrimination occurs only on the surfaces rather than over the entire domain, and the number of boundary elements required is generally a lot less than the number of finite elements required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These advantages, and others, are discussed in more detail in previous works concerning sensitivity analyses with geometric variables involving: elastostatic structures [1,5,6], fatigue crack growth [7,8,9], creep [10], plate bending [11], and topology optimization [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%