2018
DOI: 10.1193/081617eqs160m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Elements of Special Reinforced Concrete Walls Tested under Different Loading Paths

Abstract: Large inelastic tensile strains and wide horizontal cracks primarily caused by in-plane loading, may lead to local out-of-plane deformations of the end regions of reinforced concrete (RC) walls within a buckled zone that comprises the plastic hinge length. Critical parameters that influence the onset of this failure mode have been studied through past experimental tests on RC prisms subjected to axial loading, which simulates the response of end regions of RC walls under in-plane demands. Missing from those st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be mentioned that the type of restraint at the storey level that allows rotation in the OOP direction as well as the type of strain gradient along the wall height would affect the buckling length. The fully fixed boundary conditions with a strain gradient that is fairly uniform along the height (similar to the one of the isolated boundary zones under tensile-compressive cycles [12]) limits the buckling length to 60% of the unsupported height. However, if there is no restraint provided at the storey level against the rotation in the OOP direction, as was the case in some wall experiments [15], the buckling length would be close to the whole unsupported height of the wall [26].…”
Section: Failure Mechanism and Controlling Parameters Salient Features Of Oop Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be mentioned that the type of restraint at the storey level that allows rotation in the OOP direction as well as the type of strain gradient along the wall height would affect the buckling length. The fully fixed boundary conditions with a strain gradient that is fairly uniform along the height (similar to the one of the isolated boundary zones under tensile-compressive cycles [12]) limits the buckling length to 60% of the unsupported height. However, if there is no restraint provided at the storey level against the rotation in the OOP direction, as was the case in some wall experiments [15], the buckling length would be close to the whole unsupported height of the wall [26].…”
Section: Failure Mechanism and Controlling Parameters Salient Features Of Oop Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic findings of these studies were confirmed by Chai and Elayer [5], who investigated the OOP instability of structural walls by testing concrete columns that represented boundary zones of rectangular walls. This method has become a common approach for investigating this mode of failure [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, many assumptions need to be made such as: a) the wall region that undergoes the OOP instability, b) the boundary conditions at the top, bottom and along the edge that joins the boundary zone to the central wall panel, and c) the height of the wall involved in the formation of OOP instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed that such type of failure is so critical that can lead to partial or total collapses of multi-storey reinforced concrete buildings [37]. This phenomenon can appear when the boundary edges of seismic walls have sustained a large size of tensile loading during the first semi-cycle of seismic loading and then are subjected to a compressive loading during the second semi-cycle of earthquake loading [38]- [41]. Transverse buckling appears when the cracks formed during the first stage of tensile loading have such a large width that makes it impossible to be closed during the second stage of compressive loading [42]- [51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this type of failure had been previously reported experimentally (Goodsir, 1985;Oesterle et al, 1976;Thomsen and Wallace, 2004), this was the first time it had been widely observed after earthquake events. Correspondingly, there has recently been a great deal of experimental and numerical investigative research focusing on the out-of-plane instability of RC walls due to in-plane loading (Dashti et al, 2018;Haro et al, 2018;Parra and Moehle, 2017;Rosso et al, 2016;Rosso et al, 2018). However, all of these recently tested specimens were either planar (i.e., rectangular) walls or idealized boundary elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%