2008
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/03/053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BoundarySmatrix of an open XXZ spin chain with nondiagonal boundary terms

Abstract: Using a recently proposed solution for an open antiferromagnetic spin-1/2 XXZ quantum spin chain with N (even) spins and two arbitrary boundary parameters at roots of unity, we compute the boundary scattering amplitudes for one-hole states. We also deduce the relations between the lattice boundary parameters appearing in the spin-chain Hamiltonian and the IR (infrared) parameters that appear in the boundary sine-Gordon S matrix. 1 β 2 = 8(π − µ) 2 Very recently, similar relations were found for the open XXZ sp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that the term depending on the boundary parameters (2.16) is 'double' compared to the diagonal case studied in [6,7]. Analogous phenomenon occurs in the open critical XXZ chain [14,15] and the sine-Gordon model [13]. It is straightforward to see that in the diagonal limit we recover the results of [6,7].…”
Section: (216)supporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Notice that the term depending on the boundary parameters (2.16) is 'double' compared to the diagonal case studied in [6,7]. Analogous phenomenon occurs in the open critical XXZ chain [14,15] and the sine-Gordon model [13]. It is straightforward to see that in the diagonal limit we recover the results of [6,7].…”
Section: (216)supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Such configurations have been utilized in deriving the kink-antikink scattering amplitudes in the bulk XXZ model (see e.g. [7]) as well as in open XXZ chain with the most general boundary conditions [15], where the 'duality' p ± → −p ± cannot be implemented for the derivation of the second eigenvalue of the boundary S-matrix. Notice that the term depending on the boundary parameters (2.16) is 'double' compared to the diagonal case studied in [6,7].…”
Section: Bethe Ansatz and Boundary S-matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations