1994
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620370108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary integral equations for thin bodies

Abstract: SUMMARYA boundary integral equation formulation for thin bodies which uses CBIE (conventional BIE) only is well known to be degenerate. A mixed formulation for a thin rigid scatterer which combines CBIE and HBIE (hypersingular BIE) is motivated by examining the discretized form of the integral equations, and this formulation is shown to be nondegenerate for thin non-rigid inclusion problems. A near-singular integration procedure, useful for singular integrals as well, is presented. Finally, numerical examples … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
54
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Special solution strategies can be adopted that avoid this problem. The so-called dual BEM formulation is one such strategy (as reported in Portela et al [8], Chen and Hong [9] and Krishnasamy et al [10]): in it, both the classic boundary integral equation and its first spatial derivative along the orthogonal direction to the boundary are used to obtain a non-singular system of equations. If the thickness of the obstacle is null a very effective Traction-BEM (TBEM) formulation can also be used (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special solution strategies can be adopted that avoid this problem. The so-called dual BEM formulation is one such strategy (as reported in Portela et al [8], Chen and Hong [9] and Krishnasamy et al [10]): in it, both the classic boundary integral equation and its first spatial derivative along the orthogonal direction to the boundary are used to obtain a non-singular system of equations. If the thickness of the obstacle is null a very effective Traction-BEM (TBEM) formulation can also be used (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huang and Cruse (1993) presented another approach taking a coordinate transformation to relax nearly singular kernels. Other approaches include Gaussian integration with fine subdivisions, kernel cancellation methods (Nakagawa, 1993), the auxiliary surface of "tent" method (Lutz et al, 1992), and the line integral method (Krishnasamy et al, 1994, Liu et al, 1993, and Liu, 1998. Sladek et al (2001) proposed a semi-analytical integration scheme to deal with the logarithmic singularity in BEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable effort has been put into this so-called thin-body problem in recent years in order to make it tractable with BEM, and different formulations have been proposed that can alleviate or remove such difficulties. [1][2][3][4] There is a second family of cases that shares many features with thin bodies. This may be named the narrow-gap problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 First, the coefficient matrix becomes ill-conditioned as the distance gets smaller, and second, the integrals are near singular and difficult to solve numerically. The methods proposed to get around these difficulties in the thin-body variant fall into two groups: multidomain methods and normal-derivative equation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation