21st AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference 2013
DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-2445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary Layer Adaptivity for Transonic Turbulent Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, the wall modeling was assumed as a tradeoff between computational resource available and reliability on the results leading to the requirement that the first cell height was beyond the viscous sublayer and into the log-layer or overlap region (y+ ~ 30). In such a way, it was possible to assure that the results were asymptotically converged for drag values (DCd between the configurations) and are expected to be in accordance with other works in literature such as Jongen (1992), Knopp (2006) and Chitale et al (2014) among others, at the time of this research. The next section shows the results obtained with the RANS simulations of these four air-intake geometries at two different angle-of-attack conditions: (AOA = α = 2°) at cruise condition and (AOA = α = 15°) emulating take-off condition.…”
Section: Computational Meshsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, the wall modeling was assumed as a tradeoff between computational resource available and reliability on the results leading to the requirement that the first cell height was beyond the viscous sublayer and into the log-layer or overlap region (y+ ~ 30). In such a way, it was possible to assure that the results were asymptotically converged for drag values (DCd between the configurations) and are expected to be in accordance with other works in literature such as Jongen (1992), Knopp (2006) and Chitale et al (2014) among others, at the time of this research. The next section shows the results obtained with the RANS simulations of these four air-intake geometries at two different angle-of-attack conditions: (AOA = α = 2°) at cruise condition and (AOA = α = 15°) emulating take-off condition.…”
Section: Computational Meshsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Figure 15 shows in detail the mesh generated in this region for each of the proposed cases. It is also important to say that to simulate boundary layers in turbulent flow requires fine grid spacing near the walls, closely dependent on the choice of the turbulence model (Chitale et al 2014). In this work, the wall modeling was assumed as a tradeoff between computational resource available and reliability on the results leading to the requirement that the first cell height was beyond the viscous sublayer and into the log-layer or overlap region (y+ ~ 30).…”
Section: Computational Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using boundary layer meshes as used in this analysis, it is required to either maintain the layered structure during adaptivity or adapt the wall normal direction in such a way so as to create acceptable meshes for the turbulence model. Previous attempts have been made to use flow physics to drive boundary layer mesh adaptation 6 for simpler meshes but such an approach is under development and testing for complex geometries like multi-element wings.…”
Section: Adaptive Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boundary layer adaptivity in the thickness direction using physics-based indicators has been carried out for simpler configurations. 6 Anisotropic boundary layer mesh adaptivity is significantly more complex for configurations, such as multi-element wings, than previously studied examples. The challenges are two fold: the surface mesh needs to be adapted anisotropically which presents challenges for complex geometries, and the geometric approximation of the mesh needs to be improved as the mesh is refined which is critical for curved surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%